Just to be clear, the release notes still carry the warning about this,
and the code to use force when doing rebalance is still in place.
As we have received the feedback that this works, these will be removed
in the subsequent minor release for the various streams as appropriate.
Thanks,
Shyam
On 06/05/2017 07:36 AM, Gandalf Corvotempesta wrote:
Great, thanks!
Il 5 giu 2017 6:49 AM, "Krutika Dhananjay" <kdhananj@xxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:kdhananj@xxxxxxxxxx>> ha scritto:
The fixes are already available in 3.10.2, 3.8.12 and 3.11.0
-Krutika
On Sun, Jun 4, 2017 at 5:30 PM, Gandalf Corvotempesta
<gandalf.corvotempesta@xxxxxxxxx
<mailto:gandalf.corvotempesta@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Great news.
Is this planned to be published in next release?
Il 29 mag 2017 3:27 PM, "Krutika Dhananjay" <kdhananj@xxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:kdhananj@xxxxxxxxxx>> ha scritto:
Thanks for that update. Very happy to hear it ran fine
without any issues. :)
Yeah so you can ignore those 'No such file or directory'
errors. They represent a transient state where DHT in the
client process is yet to figure out the new location of the
file.
-Krutika
On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 6:51 PM, Mahdi Adnan
<mahdi.adnan@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:mahdi.adnan@xxxxxxxxxxx>>
wrote:
Hello,
Yes, i forgot to upgrade the client as well.
I did the upgrade and created a new volume, same options
as before, with one VM running and doing lots of IOs. i
started the rebalance with force and after it completed
the process i rebooted the VM, and it did start normally
without issues.
I repeated the process and did another rebalance while
the VM running and everything went fine.
But the logs in the client throwing lots of warning
messages:
[2017-05-29 13:14:59.416382] W [MSGID: 114031]
[client-rpc-fops.c:2928:client3_3_lookup_cbk]
2-gfs_vol2-client-2: remote operation failed. Path:
/50294ed6-db7a-418d-965f-9b44c69a83fd/images/d59487fe-f3a9-4bad-a607-3a181c871711/aa01c3a0-5aa0-432d-82ad-d1f515f1d87f
(93c403f5-c769-44b9-a087-dc51fc21412e) [No such file or
directory]
[2017-05-29 13:14:59.416427] W [MSGID: 114031]
[client-rpc-fops.c:2928:client3_3_lookup_cbk]
2-gfs_vol2-client-3: remote operation failed. Path:
/50294ed6-db7a-418d-965f-9b44c69a83fd/images/d59487fe-f3a9-4bad-a607-3a181c871711/aa01c3a0-5aa0-432d-82ad-d1f515f1d87f
(93c403f5-c769-44b9-a087-dc51fc21412e) [No such file or
directory]
[2017-05-29 13:14:59.808251] W [MSGID: 114031]
[client-rpc-fops.c:2928:client3_3_lookup_cbk]
2-gfs_vol2-client-2: remote operation failed. Path:
/50294ed6-db7a-418d-965f-9b44c69a83fd/images/d59487fe-f3a9-4bad-a607-3a181c871711/aa01c3a0-5aa0-432d-82ad-d1f515f1d87f
(93c403f5-c769-44b9-a087-dc51fc21412e) [No such file or
directory]
[2017-05-29 13:14:59.808287] W [MSGID: 114031]
[client-rpc-fops.c:2928:client3_3_lookup_cbk]
2-gfs_vol2-client-3: remote operation failed. Path:
/50294ed6-db7a-418d-965f-9b44c69a83fd/images/d59487fe-f3a9-4bad-a607-3a181c871711/aa01c3a0-5aa0-432d-82ad-d1f515f1d87f
(93c403f5-c769-44b9-a087-dc51fc21412e) [No such file or
directory]
Although the process went smooth, i will run another
extensive test tomorrow just to be sure.
--
Respectfully*
**Mahdi A. Mahdi*
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* Krutika Dhananjay <kdhananj@xxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:kdhananj@xxxxxxxxxx>>
*Sent:* Monday, May 29, 2017 9:20:29 AM
*To:* Mahdi Adnan
*Cc:* gluster-user; Gandalf Corvotempesta; Lindsay
Mathieson; Kevin Lemonnier
*Subject:* Re: Rebalance + VM corruption - current
status and request for feedback
Hi,
I took a look at your logs.
It very much seems like an issue that is caused by a
mismatch in glusterfs client and server packages.
So your client (mount) seems to be still running 3.7.20,
as confirmed by the occurrence of the following log message:
[2017-05-26 08:58:23.647458] I [MSGID: 100030]
[glusterfsd.c:2338:main] 0-/usr/sbin/glusterfs: Started
running /usr/sbin/glusterfs version 3.7.20 (args:
/usr/sbin/glusterfs --volfile-server=s1
--volfile-server=s2 --volfile-server=s3
--volfile-server=s4 --volfile-id=/testvol
/rhev/data-center/mnt/glusterSD/s1:_testvol)
[2017-05-26 08:58:40.901204] I [MSGID: 100030]
[glusterfsd.c:2338:main] 0-/usr/sbin/glusterfs: Started
running /usr/sbin/glusterfs version 3.7.20 (args:
/usr/sbin/glusterfs --volfile-server=s1
--volfile-server=s2 --volfile-server=s3
--volfile-server=s4 --volfile-id=/testvol
/rhev/data-center/mnt/glusterSD/s1:_testvol)
[2017-05-26 08:58:48.923452] I [MSGID: 100030]
[glusterfsd.c:2338:main] 0-/usr/sbin/glusterfs: Started
running /usr/sbin/glusterfs version 3.7.20 (args:
/usr/sbin/glusterfs --volfile-server=s1
--volfile-server=s2 --volfile-server=s3
--volfile-server=s4 --volfile-id=/testvol
/rhev/data-center/mnt/glusterSD/s1:_testvol)
whereas the servers have rightly been upgraded to
3.10.2, as seen in rebalance log:
[2017-05-26 09:36:36.075940] I [MSGID: 100030]
[glusterfsd.c:2475:main] 0-/usr/sbin/glusterfs: Started
running /usr/sbin/glusterfs version 3.10.2 (args:
/usr/sbin/glusterfs -s localhost --volfile-id
rebalance/testvol --xlator-option *dht.use-readdirp=yes
--xlator-option *dht.lookup-unhashed=yes --xlator-option
*dht.assert-no-child-down=yes --xlator-option
*replicate*.data-self-heal=off --xlator-option
*replicate*.metadata-self-heal=off --xlator-option
*replicate*.entry-self-heal=off --xlator-option
*dht.readdir-optimize=on --xlator-option
*dht.rebalance-cmd=5 --xlator-option
*dht.node-uuid=7c0bf49e-1ede-47b1-b9a5-bfde6e60f07b
--xlator-option *dht.commit-hash=3376396580
<tel:(337)%20639-6580> --socket-file
/var/run/gluster/gluster-rebalance-801faefa-a583-46b4-8eef-e0ec160da9ea.sock
--pid-file
/var/lib/glusterd/vols/testvol/rebalance/7c0bf49e-1ede-47b1-b9a5-bfde6e60f07b.pid
-l /var/log/glusterfs/testvol-rebalance.log)
Could you upgrade all packages to 3.10.2 and try again?
-Krutika
On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 4:46 PM, Mahdi Adnan
<mahdi.adnan@xxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:mahdi.adnan@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Hi,
Attached are the logs for both the rebalance and the
mount.
--
Respectfully*
**Mahdi A. Mahdi*
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* Krutika Dhananjay <kdhananj@xxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:kdhananj@xxxxxxxxxx>>
*Sent:* Friday, May 26, 2017 1:12:28 PM
*To:* Mahdi Adnan
*Cc:* gluster-user; Gandalf Corvotempesta; Lindsay
Mathieson; Kevin Lemonnier
*Subject:* Re: Rebalance + VM corruption - current
status and request for feedback
Could you provide the rebalance and mount logs?
-Krutika
On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 3:17 PM, Mahdi Adnan
<mahdi.adnan@xxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:mahdi.adnan@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Good morning,
So i have tested the new Gluster 3.10.2, and
after starting rebalance two VMs were paused due
to storage error and third one was not responding.
After rebalance completed i started the VMs and
it did not boot, and throw an XFS wrong inode
error into the screen.
My setup:
4 nodes running CentOS7.3 with Gluster 3.10.2
4 bricks in distributed replica with group set
to virt.
I added the volume to ovirt and created three
VMs, i ran a loop to create 5GB file inside the VMs.
Added new 4 bricks to the existing nodes.
Started rebalane "with force to bypass the
warning message"
VMs started to fail after rebalancing.
--
Respectfully*
**Mahdi A. Mahdi*
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* Krutika Dhananjay <kdhananj@xxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:kdhananj@xxxxxxxxxx>>
*Sent:* Wednesday, May 17, 2017 6:59:20 AM
*To:* gluster-user
*Cc:* Gandalf Corvotempesta; Lindsay Mathieson;
Kevin Lemonnier; Mahdi Adnan
*Subject:* Rebalance + VM corruption - current
status and request for feedback
Hi,
In the past couple of weeks, we've sent the
following fixes concerning VM corruption upon
doing rebalance -
https://review.gluster.org/#/q/status:merged+project:glusterfs+branch:master+topic:bug-1440051
<https://review.gluster.org/#/q/status:merged+project:glusterfs+branch:master+topic:bug-1440051>
These fixes are very much part of the latest
3.10.2 release.
Satheesaran within Red Hat also verified that
they work and he's not seeing corruption issues
anymore.
I'd like to hear feedback from the users
themselves on these fixes (on your test
environments to begin with) before even changing
the status of the bug to CLOSED.
Although 3.10.2 has a patch that prevents
rebalance sub-commands from being executed on
sharded volumes, you can override the check by
using the 'force' option.
For example,
# gluster volume rebalance myvol start force
Very much looking forward to hearing from you all.
Thanks,
Krutika
_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users