Re: Reasons for recommending nfs-ganesha

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Jiffin

I understood that glusterfs nfs supports only bug fixes.
I appreciate your support and help so much.

--
Yamauchi

> 
> Hi,
> 
> 
> On 19/05/17 18:27, te-yamauchi@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > I currently use version 3.10.2.
> > When nfs is enabled, the following warning is displayed.
> > Why is nfs-ganesha recommended?
> > Is there something wrong with gluster nfs?
> >
> > Gluster NFS is being deprecated in favor of NFS-Ganesha Enter "yes" to
> > continue using Gluster NFS (y/n)
> 
> The main reason behind above warning message is that currently most of the
> development focus happens in NFS-Ganesha than gluster nfs(only bug fixes).
> The following are major plus points for NFS-Ganesha
> 1.) NFS-Ganesha is a different community which supports a lot of other
> fIlesystem like CEPH(cephFS / RGW), GPFS, Lustre
> 2.) It support different nfs protocols including v3,v4, v4.1 and pNFS where as
> gluster NFS supports only v3
> 3.) Can do dynamic addition/modification of exports(shares) , where in gluster
> nfs each time server requires restart 4.)It has an integrated HA solution using
> pacemaker & corosync for gluster volumes
> 
> --
> Jiffin
> 
> 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Gluster-users mailing list
> > Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users

_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users



[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Development]     [Linux Filesytems Development]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux