On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 2:36 PM, Kaushal M <kshlmster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Niels found that the HALO patch has pulled in a little bit of the IPv6On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 3:55 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri
<pkarampu@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 9:01 PM, Shyam <srangana@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Release 3.11 for gluster has been branched [1] and tagged [2].
>>
>> We have ~4weeks to release of 3.11, and a week to backport features that
>> slipped the branching date (May-5th).
>>
>> A tracker BZ [3] has been opened for *blockers* of 3.11 release. Request
>> that any bug that is determined as a blocker for the release be noted as a
>> "blocks" against this bug.
>>
>> NOTE: Just a heads up, all bugs that are to be backported in the next 4
>> weeks need not be reflected against the blocker, *only* blocker bugs
>> identified that should prevent the release, need to be tracked against this
>> tracker bug.
>>
>> We are not building beta1 packages, and will build out RC0 packages once
>> we cross the backport dates. Hence, folks interested in testing this out can
>> either build from the code or wait for (about) a week longer for the
>> packages (and initial release notes).
>>
>> Features tracked as slipped and expected to be backported by 5th May are,
>>
>> 1) [RFE] libfuse rebase to latest? #153 (@amar, @csaba)
>>
>> 2) SELinux support for Gluster Volumes #55 (@ndevos, @jiffin)
>> - Needs a +2 on https://review.gluster.org/13762
>>
>> 3) Enhance handleops readdirplus operation to return handles along with
>> dirents #174 (@skoduri)
>>
>> 4) Halo - Initial version (@pranith)
>
>
> I merged the patch on master. Will send out the port on Thursday. I have to
> leave like right now to catch train and am on leave tomorrow, so will be
> back on Thursday and get the port done. Will also try to get the other
> patches fb guys mentioned post that preferably by 5th itself.
patch. This shouldn't have happened.
The IPv6 patch is currently stalled because it depends on an internal
FB library. The IPv6 bits that made it in pull this dependency.
This would have lead to a -2 on the HALO patch by me, but as I wasn't
aware of it, the patch was merged.
The IPV6 changes are in rpcsvh.{c,h} and configure.ac, and don't seem
to affect anything HALO. So they should be easily removable and should
be removed.
As per the configure.ac the macro is enabled only when we are building gluster with "--with-fb-extras", which I don't think we do anywhere, so didn't think they are important at the moment. Sorry for the confusion caused because of this. Thanks to Kaushal for the patch. I will backport that one as well when I do the 3.11 backport of HALO. So will wait for the backport until Kaushal's patch is merged.
>
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Kaushal, Shyam
>>
>> [1] 3.11 Branch: https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/tree/release-3.11
>>
>> [2] Tag for 3.11.0beta1 :
>> https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/tree/v3.11.0beta1
>>
>> [3] Tracker BZ for 3.11.0 blockers:
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=glusterfs-3.11.0
>>
>> _______________________________________________ > ______________________________
>> maintainers mailing list
>> maintainers@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
>
>
>
>
> --
> Pranith
>
_________________
> Gluster-devel mailing list
> Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
--
Pranith
_______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
