2017-04-27 13:31 GMT+02:00 Pranith Kumar Karampuri <pkarampu@xxxxxxxxxx>: > But even after that fix, it is still leading to pause. And these are the two > updates on what the developers are doing as per my understanding. So that > workflow is not stable yet IMO. So, even after that fix, two more critical bug leading to dataloss/corruption where found ? I'm sorry but this is pure madness, plese put a "beta" label on sharding or gluster itself. 4 bugs in a row making loose of data in a software enginereed to keep data safe are unacceptable. Yes, all software has bug, but not with this frequency, for the same reason, with the same results: data loss. I'm really, really, really warried to put my company valuable data in a gluster storage. If I loose hundreds of VMs at once, i'm really fucked. Yes, backup exists, but try to say to your customers that you have to restore 20TB from backups (it takes days....) and that they lost many ecommerce orders/transactions. _______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
