Re: supermicro 60/90 bay servers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Our use case is archive storage so we are mainly after high capacity setups with some sort of resilliency. We do have 10gig nics on these boxes, but thats mainly for resync etc. For our end user traffic we dont need more than 1gig per server.

Is it possible to change the EC setup when/if we double the number of nodes in the cluster?

kind regards
ingard

2017-04-20 20:03 GMT+02:00 Serkan Çoban <cobanserkan@xxxxxxxxx>:
What is your use case? Disperse is good for archive workloads, big files.
I suggest you to buy 10 servers and use 8+2 EC configuration. This way you can
handle two node failures. We are using 28 disk servers but our next
cluster will use 68 disk servers.


On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 1:19 PM, Ingard Mevåg <ingard@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi
>
> We've been looking at supermicro 60 and 90 bay servers. Are anyone else
> using these models (or similar density) for gluster?
> Specifically I'd like to setup a distributed disperse volume with 8 of these
> servers.
>
> Any insight, does and donts or best practice guidelines would be appreciated
> :)
>
> kind regards
> Ingard
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-users mailing list
> Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users


_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users

[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Development]     [Linux Filesytems Development]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux