Hi Amar,
Currently, we are running 40 node cluster and each node has 36*6TB(210TB).As of now we don't face any issue with read and write performance except folder listing and disk failure healing. Planning to start another cluster with 36*10TB(360)per node. What kind of problem will we face if we go with 36*10(360)per node. Planned 360TB per node is far from recommended 64TB. We are using Glusterfs with disperse volume for video archival.
Regards
K. Mohamed Pakkeer
On 20-Apr-2017 9:00 AM, "Amar Tumballi" <atumball@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Wed, 19 Apr 2017 at 11:07 PM, Peter B. <pb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:Hello,
Could you tell me what the technically maximum limit of capacity of a
GlusterFS storage is?
I cannot find any official statement on this...
Somewhere it says "several Petabytes", but that's a bit vague.It is mostly vague because the total storage depends on 2 things, what is per node storage you can get, and then how many nodes you have in cluster?It is scalable comfortably for 128nodes, and per node you can have 64TB drives, making it 8PB.
I'd need it for arguing pro GlusterFS in comparison to other systems.Hope the above info helps you. Btw, we are targeting more scalability related improvements in Gluster 4.0, so it should be much larger number from next year.-Amar
Thank you very much in advance,
Peter B.
_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
--Amar Tumballi (amarts)
_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
_______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
