[+gluster-users]
On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 1:57 PM, Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi,a few weeks ago I opened a survey asking oVirt users about how they use oVirt.Here are the analytics of the survey:https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1s3k4pq_U4vHTuUUKr6dOosGj_ EGFxqEisansHlqnyyM/ viewanalytics#responses Most notable facts:- 197 responses, two times the responses we got with the 3.6 survey!- CentOS confims as the most used distribution for running oVirt engine (89.8%) and Hypervisors (74.3% which become 94.2% including oVirt Node which is a CentOS spin)- Fedora is the second distribution (4.6%) mostly used only for runnig oVirt engine- oVirt Node jumped from 7.1% on 3.6 survey to 19.9% in 4.1!- Surprisingly we have someone running both engine and hypervisor on Ubuntu based system, within VMs. I'd like to hear more about this use case.- Within other OS we had Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 and 7 and Scientific Linux (I guess 7, wasn't specified)- Within the storage, there isn't a "winner" between NFS, Gluster and iSCSI. Within Other Storage, Fiber Channel is the most used. We had also: Ceph, DAS, EMC ScaleIO, GPFS- Hosted Engine is the most used deployment choice with 58.4% (was 50.0% in 3.6)- 65.8% of Hosted Engine users use it in Hyperconverged setup.Thank you for your feedback and appreciation, we'll look into suggestions you sent in the survey.--SANDRO BONAZZOLA
ASSOCIATE MANAGER, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, EMEA ENG VIRTUALIZATION R&D
_______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
