On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 12:19 PM, ABHISHEK PALIWAL <abhishpaliwal@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
yes it is ext4. but what is the impact of this.
Did you have a lot of data before and you deleted all that data? ext4 if I remember correctly doesn't decrease size of directory once it expands it. So in ext4 inside a directory if you create lots and lots of files and delete them all, the directory size would increase at the time of creation but won't decrease after deletion. I don't have any system with ext4 at the moment to test it now. This is something we faced 5-6 years back but not sure if it is fixed in ext4 in the latest releases.
--On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 9:26 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri <pkarampu@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:Yes--On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 8:21 AM, ABHISHEK PALIWAL <abhishpaliwal@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:Means the fs where this brick has been created?
On Apr 13, 2017 8:19 AM, "Pranith Kumar Karampuri" <pkarampu@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:Is your backend filesystem ext4?On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 6:29 AM, ABHISHEK PALIWAL <abhishpaliwal@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:No,we are not using sharding
On Apr 12, 2017 7:29 PM, "Alessandro Briosi" <ab1@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:Il 12/04/2017 14:16, ABHISHEK PALIWAL ha scritto:
I have did more investigation and find out that brick dir size is equivalent to gluster mount point but .glusterfs having too much difference
You are probably using sharding?
Buon lavoro.
Alessandro Briosi
METAL.it Nord S.r.l.
Via Maioliche 57/C - 38068 Rovereto (TN)
Tel.+39.0464.430130 - Fax +39.0464.437393
www.metalit.com
_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
--PranithPranith
Regards
Abhishek Paliwal
--
Pranith
_______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
