Re: [Gluster-devel] Release 3.10.1: Scheduled for the 30th of March

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 03/27/2017 03:25 PM, Gandalf Corvotempesta wrote:
2017-03-27 18:59 GMT+02:00 Shyam <srangana@xxxxxxxxxx>:
1) Are there any pending *blocker* bugs that need to be tracked for 3.10.1?
If so mark them against the provided tracker [2] as blockers for the
release, or at the very least post them as a response to this mail

I think that file corruption when sharding is enabled during a rebalance *must*
be considered blocker for any release.

I agree the problem is critical and needs a resolution soon.

But, till we have a resolution for the same, we cannot hold other bugs/releases at bay. In this case, it forms a good limitation/known issue, for the release, and can be added to the release-notes, so that there is no confusion created anywhere.

Further, we could possibly disable rebalance when shard is in the mix, so that new users (or those that miss the release notes) do not shoot them selves in the foot.


If you still continue to release new version with the same bugs around,
you only create confusion to users, willing to think that bugs
(especially the critical ones)
are fixed.

Our intention is never to confuse anyone about a release, in stating that a fix is available when it is not. The release notes should be clear in that regard.

For *this* bug I think Krutika provided a detailed enough response on why we thought it was fixed, and where we stand now, so I am not going to restate that again, as her response is detailed well.


I've never ever seen a software releasing new versions ignoring existing bugs.

Are you stating we should fix *all* *pre-existing* critical(?) bugs before releasing? If so the short answer is, that will not happen. (regressions introduced and discovered within a release cycle are a different matter though, and will go through enough scrutiny before a decision to release or postpone the release is taken)

To repeat myself, I do understand that this is a critical bug, and we apologize for the problem at hand, but as stated in the other mail thread, this is proving difficult to reproduce and root cause. Any help towards the same would be much appreciated, than delaying releases for other fixes that are already in the code.

Kind regards,
Shyam
_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users



[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Development]     [Linux Filesytems Development]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux