Re: Volume rebalance issue

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Many thanks, It worked great.

I created a volume same as before and created a vm and played with it while i expanded the volume with two more bricks.

After rebalancing, i rebooted the VM and it worked just fine without any issues.




--

Respectfully
Mahdi A. Mahdi



From: Krutika Dhananjay <kdhananj@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, February 27, 2017 8:11:31 AM
To: Mahdi Adnan
Cc: Gandalf Corvotempesta; gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Volume rebalance issue
 
I've attached the src tarball with the patches that fix this issue, applied on top of the head of release-3.8 branch.

-Krutika

On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 11:36 PM, Mahdi Adnan <mahdi.adnan@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


I created a distributed replicated volume, set the group virt, enabled sharding, migrated a few VMs to the volume, after that i added more bricks to the volume and started the rebalance, i checked the VMs and it was corrupted.

And yes, what you suggested about Gluster is on point, i think we need to have more bug fixes and performance enhancements.

Im going to deploy a test Gluster soon just to test patches and updates and report back bugs and issues.


--

Respectfully
Mahdi A. Mahdi



From: Gandalf Corvotempesta <gandalf.corvotempesta@gmail.com>
Sent: Sunday, February 26, 2017 11:07:04 AM
To: Mahdi Adnan
Cc: gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Volume rebalance issue
 
How did you replicate the issue?
Next week I'll spin up a gluster storage and I would like to try the same to see the corruption and to test any patches from gluster

Il 25 feb 2017 4:31 PM, "Mahdi Adnan" <mahdi.adnan@xxxxxxxxxxx> ha scritto:

Hi,


We have a volume of 4 servers 8x2 bricks (Distributed-Replicate) hosting VMs for ESXi, i tried expanding the volume with 8 more bricks, and after rebalancing the volume, the VMs got corrupted.

Gluster version is 3.8.9 and the volume is using the default parameters of group "virt" plus sharding.

I created a new volume without sharding and got the same issue after the rebalance.

I checked the reported bugs and the mailing list, and i noticed it's a bug in Gluster.

Is it affecting all of Gluster versions ? is there any workaround or a volume setup that is not affected by this issue ?


Thank you.


--

Respectfully
Mahdi A. Mahdi



_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users


_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users

_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users

[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Development]     [Linux Filesytems Development]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux