Re: 90 Brick/Server suggestions?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>Any particular reason for this, other than maximising space by avoiding two layers of RAID/redundancy?
Yes that's right we can get 720TB net usable space per server with
90*10TB disks. Any RAID layer will cost too much..


On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 6:13 PM, Gambit15 <dougti+gluster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> RAID is not an option, JBOD with EC will be used.
>
>
> Any particular reason for this, other than maximising space by avoiding two
> layers of RAID/redundancy?
> Local RAID would be far simpler & quicker for replacing failed drives, and
> it would greatly reduce the number of bricks & load on Gluster.
>
> We use RAID volumes for our bricks, and the benefits of simplified
> management far outweigh the costs of a little lost capacity.
>
> D
_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users



[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Development]     [Linux Filesytems Development]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux