Hi, I ran some benchmarking on SSD enabled servers, 10Gb connected, see the file attached. I'm still looking at GlusterFS as a persistent storage for containers, and it's clear it's not going to compete with local file system performance. Cheers, Vladimir On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 12:28 PM, Alex Sudakar <alex.sudakar@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi. I'm looking for a clustered filesystem for a very simple > scenario. I've set up Gluster but my tests have shown quite a > performance penalty when compared to using a local XFS filesystem. > This no doubt reflects the reality of moving to a proper distributed > filesystem, but I'd like to quickly check that I haven't missed > something obvious that might improve performance.
Attachment:
GlusterFS-benchmarking.png
Description: PNG image
_______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
