|
Actually SSHFS works very well in a single user situation. We have seen similar performance to NFS with it and of course it
tunnels through firewalls a lot more easily, so its been our go to
when live migrating among clusters, especially as we have a mix of
shared storage and direct storage depending upon the need of the
devs who use the various systems. That being said, if NFS is already there, then yes, a simple mount is easier than yum install fuse-ssh and then:
<Grin> I just checked and on our older Gluster boxes, still on 3.4. NFS is turned off, perhaps deliberately by the tech who installed
it. On the newer versions, I was under the impression that NFS was deprecated in favor of Ganesha? Is that turned on by default? -wk On 1/19/2017 1:02 AM, Kevin Lemonnier
wrote:
In a pinch you can use SSHFS for temp shared storage for a storage migration, and avoid the NFS setup.GlusterFS comes with an NFS export by default, so there really isn't any setup to do that, jut a simple mount -t nfs. It's even simpler than sshfs, and I'm pretty sure the VM will work a lot better during the live migration using nfs than sshfs :) |
_______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
