Thanks for doing this Daryl. The help is appreciated. On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 12:37 AM, Daryl lee <daryllee@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Thanks everyone for the information. I'm happy to help provide test repo feedback on an ongoing basis to help things along which I'll do right now. > > Niels, > If you require more or less information please let me know, happy to help. Thanks for doing the builds! > > I deployed GlusterFS v3.8.8 successfully to 5 servers running CentOS Linux release 7.3.1611 (Core) here are the results. > > 2 GlusterFS clients deployed the following packages: > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > glusterfs x86_64 3.8.8-1.el7 centos-gluster38-test 509 k > glusterfs-api x86_64 3.8.8-1.el7 centos-gluster38-test 89 k > glusterfs-client-xlators x86_64 3.8.8-1.el7 centos-gluster38-test 781 k > glusterfs-fuse x86_64 3.8.8-1.el7 centos-gluster38-test 133 k > glusterfs-libs x86_64 3.8.8-1.el7 centos-gluster38-test 378 k > > Tests: > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Package DOWNLOAD/UPDATE/CLEANUP from repo - SUCCESS > Basic FUSE mount RW test to remote GlusterFS volume - SUCCESS > Boot and basic functionality test of libvirt gfapi based KVM Virtual Machine - SUCCESS > > > 3 GlusterFS Brick/Volume servers running REPLICA 3 ARBITER 1 updated the following packages: > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > glusterfs x86_64 3.8.8-1.el7 centos-gluster38-test 509 k > glusterfs-api x86_64 3.8.8-1.el7 centos-gluster38-test 89 k > glusterfs-cli x86_64 3.8.8-1.el7 centos-gluster38-test 182 k > glusterfs-client-xlators x86_64 3.8.8-1.el7 centos-gluster38-test 781 k > glusterfs-fuse x86_64 3.8.8-1.el7 centos-gluster38-test 133 k > glusterfs-libs x86_64 3.8.8-1.el7 centos-gluster38-test 378 k > glusterfs-server x86_64 3.8.8-1.el7 centos-gluster38-test 1.4 M > userspace-rcu x86_64 0.7.16-3.el7 centos-gluster38-test 72 k > > Tests: > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Package DOWNLOAD/UPDATE/CLEANUP from repo - SUCCESS w/ warnings > * warning during updating of glusterfs-server-3.8.8-1.el7.x86_64 backing up gluster .vol files saved to rpmsave. This is expected. > Bricks on all 3 servers started - SUCCESS > Self Healing Daemon on all 3 servers started - SUCCESS > Bitrot Daemon on all 3 servers started - SUCCESS > Scrubber Daemon on all 3 servers started - SUCCESS > First replica self healing - success > Second replica self healing - success > Arbiter replica self healing - success > > > -Daryl > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Kaushal M [mailto:kshlmster@xxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Friday, January 13, 2017 5:03 AM > To: Daryl lee > Cc: Pavel Szalbot; gluster-users; Niels de Vos > Subject: Re: CentOS Storage SIG Repo for 3.8 is behind 3 versions (3.8.5). Is it still being used and can I help? > > Packages for 3.7, 3.8 and 3.9 are being built for the Storage SIG. > Niels is very punctual about building them. The packages first land in the respective testing repositories. If someone verifies that the packages are okay, and gives Niels a heads-up, he pushes the packages to be signed and added to the release repositories. > > The only issue is that Niels doesn't get enough (or any) verifications. And the packages linger in testing. > > On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 3:31 PM, Pavel Szalbot <pavel.szalbot@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Hi, you can install 3.8.7 from centos-gluster38-test using: >> >> yum --enablerepo=centos-gluster38-test install glusterfs >> >> I am not sure how QA works for CentOS Storage SIG, but 3.8.7 works >> same as >> 3.8.5 for me - libvirt gfapi is unfortunately broken, no other >> problems detected. >> >> Btw 3.9 is short term maintenance release >> (https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/2016-September/015197.html). >> >> >> -ps >> >> On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 1:18 AM, Daryl lee <daryllee@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> Hey Gluster Community, >>> >>> According to the community packages list I get the impression that >>> 3.8 would be released to the CentOS Storage SIG Repo, but this seems to have >>> stopped with 3.8.5 and 3.9 is still missing all together. However, 3.7 is >>> still being updated and is at 3.7.8 so I am confused why the other >>> two versions have stopped. >>> >>> >>> >>> I did some looking on the past posts to this list and found a >>> conversation about 3.9 on the CentOS repo last year but it looks like >>> it's still not up yet; possibly due to a lack of community involvement in the testing and >>> reporting back to whoever the maintainer is (which we don’t know yet)? I >>> might be in a position to help since I have a test environment that >>> mirrors my production environment setup that I would use for testing the patch >>> anyways, I might as well provide some good to the community.. At this >>> point I know to do " yum install --enablerepo=centos-gluster38-test >>> glusterfs-server" but I'm not sure who to tell if it works or not, and what >>> kind of info they are looking for. If someone wanted to give me a little >>> guidance that would be awesome, especially if it will save me from >>> having to switch to manually downloading packages. >>> >>> >>> >>> I guess the basic question is do we expect releases to resume for 3.8 >>> on the CentOS Storage SIG repo or should I be looking to move to >>> manual patching for 3.8. Additionally, if the person who does the >>> releases to the CentOS Storage SIG is waiting for someone to tell >>> them it looks fine, who should I contact to do so? >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Thanks! >>> >>> >>> >>> Daryl >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Gluster-users mailing list >>> Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx >>> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Gluster-users mailing list >> Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx >> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users > _______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
