Re: On Gluster resiliency

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Dec 24, 2016 at 5:58 PM, Lindsay Mathieson <lindsay.mathieson@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 24/12/2016 2:40 AM, Ivan Rossi wrote:
This is a RESILIENT system, in my book.

Gluster people, despite the constant stream of problems and requests
for help that you see on the ML and IRC, rest assured that you are
building a nice piece of software, at least IMHO.

Agree. Last week we had a server down for 24 hours and yes, no loss of data and nobody noticed. Once restored the server healed up in a couple of hours. Gluster 3.8.7



Past few days we had a circuit breaker continuously pop and kill server room (I need to get newer UPS's that I can monitor for time left and issue commands)

Despite numerous hard shutdowns of cluster over and over gluster popped up every time and took it like a champ.  It could have been a very bad holiday weekend otherwise.

Cheers everyone.

--
Lindsay Mathieson

_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users

_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users

[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Development]     [Linux Filesytems Development]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux