I have many data folders such as data1,data2... and this data folders contains some files. The data will be disable if one files missed. I use distributed volume storage the data folders and the files of data folder is distributed to all bricks. The all data folders will be disable if one brick down. I think out the distributed replica volume,but disk utilization is less than 50% whth replica volume.I can put up with some data missing ,but I cann't tolerate all data being disable. So,I want the data folder storage just one brick,so that ,if one brick down , it has some data folder disable in this brick and other data is well.
Thanks,
LiLi
------------------
----------------------李立
------------------ 原始邮件 ------------------
发件人: "jin deng"<cheneydeng88@xxxxxxxxx>;
发送时间: 2016年11月17日(星期四) 下午4:13
收件人: "李立"<dylan-lili@xxxxxxxxxxx>;
抄送: "gluster-users"<gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx>;
主题: [Gluster-users] How to distributed with a folder
2016年11月17日星期四，jin deng <cheneydeng88@xxxxxxxxx> 写道：
2016年11月17日星期四，李立 <dylan-lili@xxxxxxxxxxx> 写道：In distributed volume, the files will be distributed to different bricks.But,my data is a folder if it's lack of a file,the folder of data will be disabled.So, I want a specific folder will be store one brick to avoid dropping a brick and all data is disable.I don't understand your purpose.It seems you want all your data which inside one specific directory to be stored on a fixed brick(without dht) instead of letting the data dispersed among all bricks.IMO,that violates the model of "distributed volume".Not sure if i've misunderstood your purpose.Maybe someone will give a different opinion.
--Thanks,DengJin
--
Thanks,
DengJin
_______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
