Il 12 nov 2016 12:53, "Kevin Lemonnier" <lemonnierk@xxxxxxxxx> ha scritto:
> Sure, but thinking about it later we realised that it might be for the better.
> I believe when sharding is enabled the shards will be dispersed across all the
> replica sets, making it that losing a replica set will kill all your VMs.
>
> Imagine a 16x3 volume for example, losing 2 bricks could bring the whole thing
> down if they happen to be in the same replica set. (I might be wrong about the
> way gluster disperse shards, it's my understanding only, never had the chance
> to test it).
> With multiple small clusters, we have the same disk space in the end but not
> that problem, it's a bit more annoying to manage but for now that's allright.
I don't use EC because i really love the "gluster feature" to have plain files stored and not encoded in any way.
> Not really shocked there. Guess the cli should warn you when you try re-setting
> the option though, that would be nice.
Exactly. I've proposed a warning in the cli when changing the shard size but this is still unfixed and this is scaring me
it's a critical bug, IMHO, and should be addressed asap or any user could destroy the whole cluster with a simple command and no warning at all.
_______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users