Il 07 nov 2016 09:23, "Lindsay Mathieson" <lindsay.mathieson@xxxxxxxxx> ha scritto:
>
> From a quick scan, there doesn't seem to be any particular advantage
> over qemu using gfapi directly? Is this more aimed at apps that can't
> use gfapi such as vmware or as a replacement for NFS?
>
Dump question: why should i use a block storage replacing nfs?
Nfs-ganesha makes use of libgfapi, block storage does the same but also need the whole iscsi stack so performance could be lower
If i don't need direct access to a block device on the client (in example for creating custom FS or LVM and so on), the nfs ganesha should be a better approach, right?
Anyone compared performances between:
1. Fuse mount
2. Nfs
3. Nfs ganesha
4. Qemu direct access via gfapi
5. Iscsi
?
_______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
