Re: 转发: 转发: glusterfs chmod/chown bug 1343362

[Pranith Kumar Karampuri <pkarampu@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Adding Jiffin, Kaushal to the thread

On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 4:38 PM, yanping.gao@xxxxxxxxxxxx <yanping.gao@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

---

yanping.gao@xxxxxxxxxxxx

 

发件人： yanping.gao@xxxxxxxxxxxx

发送时间： 2016-08-19 19:07

收件人： ndevos; gluster-devel

抄送： gluster-devel

主题： 转发: 转发: glusterfs chmod/chown bug 1343362

---

yanping.gao@xxxxxxxxxxxx

 

发件人： yanping.gao@xxxxxxxxxxxx

发送时间： 2016-08-17 16:05

收件人： 

抄送： gluster-devel

主题： 转发: glusterfs chmod/chown bug 1343362

 

发件人： yanping.gao@xxxxxxxxxxxx

发送时间： 2016-08-17 14:33

收件人： thottanjiffin; kshlmster

抄送： javen.wu; peng.hse

主题： glusterfs chmod/chown bug 1343362

hello:

       Thanks  thotz and kshlm  for your fix of the problem glusterfs bug1343362   

       https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/commit/c04ee47d1e9847b50c459734a42681450005ee60

       I  am aware that you splited the two variables to store the argument of setattr and the lookup returned attr. I was thinking increasing the size of 

       call_state_t structure only for the problem might consume more memory for all irrelevant operations. I am trying another method and looking forward to your advise. 

       You can visit it here  https://github.com/YanyunGao/glusterfs/commit/f4e248ce2fd4cea74c19d7c9bc9a3fcd7f8edaca

   

How do you think?

  

  Thanks

---

yanping.gao@xxxxxxxxxxxx

_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users

--

Pranith

_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users