Re: Clarification on common tasks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




----- Original Message -----
> From: "Gandalf Corvotempesta" <gandalf.corvotempesta@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: "Anuradha Talur" <atalur@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: "gluster-users" <Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2016 7:46:37 PM
> Subject: Re:  Clarification on common tasks
> 
> 2016-08-11 16:13 GMT+02:00 Anuradha Talur <atalur@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> > There was a document that I'm not able to locate right now.
> > The first step after mounting the brick was to set volume ID using
> > setfattr -n trusted.glusterfs.volume-id -v <volume-id> <brickpath>.
> > I think there were more steps, I will update once I find the doc.
> > Once all the required xattrs are set, gluster v start force was supposed to
> > be done.
> 
> This is a test environment so I can break everything everytime.
> I did (only once) "replace-brick" by using a new mount point, without
> setting any fattr and
> brick process was brought up immediatly and healing is going on.
> 
> Is setfattr mandatory ?

The replace-brick you did, mentioned in the previous mails was correct and fine.
You said you have different names for old and new brick, so it works.
setfattr is *not* required in this case.

In the above case that you have quoted, I'm talking when brick names have to be the same (if you have that
requirement). There were 2 setfattrs that were needed. Anyway, sorry about the confusion.
As brick names are different, it doesn't affect your testcase.
>

-- 
Thanks,
Anuradha.
_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users



[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Development]     [Linux Filesytems Development]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux