Re: Gluster 3.7.13 NFS Crash

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 

Well, i'm not entirely sure it is a setup-related issue. If you have the steps to recreate the issue, along with the relevant
information about volume configuration, logs, core, version etc, then it would be good to track this issue through a bug report.

-Krutika

On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 8:56 PM, Mahdi Adnan <mahdi.adnan@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Thank you very much for all the efforts.
I have deployed a new cluster with 3 servers and used nfs-ganesha instead of the native nfs, so far it's working fine, also, i tried to reproduce this issue in a test environment but i had no luck and it just worked as it should be.
Do you think i should file a bug report ? or maybe it's an issue with my setup only ? 


--

Respectfully
Mahdi A. Mahdi



From: kdhananj@xxxxxxxxxx
Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2016 16:33:19 +0530

Subject: Re: Gluster 3.7.13 NFS Crash
To: mahdi.adnan@xxxxxxxxxxx
CC: gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx

Hi,

Sorry I haven't had the chance to look into this issue last week. Do you mind raising a bug in upstream with all
the relevant information and I'll take a look sometime this week?

-Krutika

On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 11:58 AM, Mahdi Adnan <mahdi.adnan@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi,

Yes, i got some messages regarding an existing file name in the renaming process while the VMs are online.

and here's the output;
(gdb) frame 2
#2  0x00007f195deb1787 in shard_common_inode_write_do (frame=0x7f19699f1164, this=0x7f195802ac10) at shard.c:3716
3716                        anon_fd = fd_anonymous (local->inode_list[i]);
(gdb) p local->fop
$1 = GF_FOP_WRITE
(gdb)


--

Respectfully
Mahdi A. Mahdi



From: kdhananj@xxxxxxxxxx
Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2016 10:48:36 +0530

Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] Gluster 3.7.13 NFS Crash
To: mahdi.adnan@xxxxxxxxxxx
CC: gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx

Also, could you print local->fop please?

-Krutika

On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 10:46 AM, Krutika Dhananjay <kdhananj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Were the images being renamed (specifically to a pathname that already exists) while they were being written to?

-Krutika

On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 1:14 PM, Mahdi Adnan <mahdi.adnan@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi,

Kindly check the following link for all 7 bricks logs;

https://db.tt/YP5qTGXk


--

Respectfully
Mahdi A. Mahdi



From: kdhananj@xxxxxxxxxx
Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2016 13:00:43 +0530

Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] Gluster 3.7.13 NFS Crash
To: mahdi.adnan@xxxxxxxxxxx
CC: gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx

Could you also attach the brick logs please?

-Krutika

On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 12:48 PM, Mahdi Adnan <mahdi.adnan@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
appreciate your help,

(gdb) frame 2
#2  0x00007f195deb1787 in shard_common_inode_write_do (frame=0x7f19699f1164, this=0x7f195802ac10) at shard.c:3716
3716                        anon_fd = fd_anonymous (local->inode_list[i]);
(gdb) p local->inode_list[0]
$4 = (inode_t *) 0x7f195c532b18
(gdb) p local->inode_list[1]
$5 = (inode_t *) 0x0
(gdb) 


--

Respectfully
Mahdi A. Mahdi



From: kdhananj@xxxxxxxxxx
Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2016 12:43:10 +0530

Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] Gluster 3.7.13 NFS Crash
To: mahdi.adnan@xxxxxxxxxxx
CC: gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx

OK.
Could you also print the values of the following variables from the original core:
i. i
ii. local->inode_list[0]
iii. local->inode_list[1]

-Krutika

On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 9:01 PM, Mahdi Adnan <mahdi.adnan@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi,

Unfortunately no, but i can setup a test bench and see if it gets the same results.

--

Respectfully
Mahdi A. Mahdi



From: kdhananj@xxxxxxxxxx
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2016 20:59:50 +0530

Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] Gluster 3.7.13 NFS Crash
To: mahdi.adnan@xxxxxxxxxxx
CC: gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx

Do you have a test case that consistently recreates this problem?

-Krutika

On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 8:32 PM, Mahdi Adnan <mahdi.adnan@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi,

 So i have updated to 3.7.14 and i still have the same issue with NFS.
based on what i have provided so far from logs and dumps do you think it's an NFS issue ? should i switch to nfs-ganesha ?
the problem is, the current setup is used in a production environment, and switching the mount point of  +50 VMs from native nfs to nfs-ganesha is not going to be smooth and without downtime, so i really appreciate your thoughts on this matter.

--

Respectfully
Mahdi A. Mahdi



From: mahdi.adnan@xxxxxxxxxxx
To: kdhananj@xxxxxxxxxx
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 08:44:16 +0300

CC: gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Gluster 3.7.13 NFS Crash

Hi,

The NFS just crashed again, latest bt;

(gdb) bt
#0  0x00007f0b71a9f210 in pthread_spin_lock () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0
#1  0x00007f0b72c6fcd5 in fd_anonymous (inode=0x0) at fd.c:804
#2  0x00007f0b64ca5787 in shard_common_inode_write_do (frame=0x7f0b707c062c, this=0x7f0b6002ac10) at shard.c:3716
#3  0x00007f0b64ca5a53 in shard_common_inode_write_post_lookup_shards_handler (frame=<optimized out>, this=<optimized out>) at shard.c:3769
#4  0x00007f0b64c9eff5 in shard_common_lookup_shards_cbk (frame=0x7f0b707c062c, cookie=<optimized out>, this=0x7f0b6002ac10, op_ret=0, 
    op_errno=<optimized out>, inode=<optimized out>, buf=0x7f0b51407640, xdata=0x7f0b72f57648, postparent=0x7f0b514076b0) at shard.c:1601
#5  0x00007f0b64efe141 in dht_lookup_cbk (frame=0x7f0b7075fcdc, cookie=<optimized out>, this=<optimized out>, op_ret=0, op_errno=0, inode=0x7f0b5f1d1f58, 
    stbuf=0x7f0b51407640, xattr=0x7f0b72f57648, postparent=0x7f0b514076b0) at dht-common.c:2174
#6  0x00007f0b651871f3 in afr_lookup_done (frame=frame@entry=0x7f0b7079a4c8, this=this@entry=0x7f0b60023ba0) at afr-common.c:1825
#7  0x00007f0b65187b84 in afr_lookup_metadata_heal_check (frame=frame@entry=0x7f0b7079a4c8, this=0x7f0b60023ba0, this@entry=0xca0bd88259f5a800)
    at afr-common.c:2068
#8  0x00007f0b6518834f in afr_lookup_entry_heal (frame=frame@entry=0x7f0b7079a4c8, this=0xca0bd88259f5a800, this@entry=0x7f0b60023ba0) at afr-common.c:2157
#9  0x00007f0b6518867d in afr_lookup_cbk (frame=0x7f0b7079a4c8, cookie=<optimized out>, this=0x7f0b60023ba0, op_ret=<optimized out>, 
    op_errno=<optimized out>, inode=<optimized out>, buf=0x7f0b564e9940, xdata=0x7f0b72f708c8, postparent=0x7f0b564e99b0) at afr-common.c:2205
#10 0x00007f0b653d6e42 in client3_3_lookup_cbk (req=<optimized out>, iov=<optimized out>, count=<optimized out>, myframe=0x7f0b7076354c)
    at client-rpc-fops.c:2981
#11 0x00007f0b72a00a30 in rpc_clnt_handle_reply (clnt=clnt@entry=0x7f0b603393c0, pollin=pollin@entry=0x7f0b50c1c2d0) at rpc-clnt.c:764
#12 0x00007f0b72a00cef in rpc_clnt_notify (trans=<optimized out>, mydata=0x7f0b603393f0, event=<optimized out>, data="" at rpc-clnt.c:925
#13 0x00007f0b729fc7c3 in rpc_transport_notify (this=this@entry=0x7f0b60349040, event=event@entry=RPC_TRANSPORT_MSG_RECEIVED, data="">)
    at rpc-transport.c:546
#14 0x00007f0b678c39a4 in socket_event_poll_in (this=this@entry=0x7f0b60349040) at socket.c:2353
#15 0x00007f0b678c65e4 in socket_event_handler (fd=fd@entry=29, idx=idx@entry=17, data="" poll_in=1, poll_out=0, poll_err=0) at socket.c:2466
#16 0x00007f0b72ca0f7a in event_dispatch_epoll_handler (event=0x7f0b564e9e80, event_pool=0x7f0b7349bf20) at event-epoll.c:575
#17 event_dispatch_epoll_worker (data="" at event-epoll.c:678
#18 0x00007f0b71a9adc5 in start_thread () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0
#19 0x00007f0b713dfced in clone () from /lib64/libc.so.6


--

Respectfully
Mahdi A. Mahdi

From: mahdi.adnan@xxxxxxxxxxx
To: kdhananj@xxxxxxxxxx
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2016 16:31:50 +0300
CC: gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] Gluster 3.7.13 NFS Crash

Many thanks,

here's the results;


(gdb) p cur_block
$15 = 4088
(gdb) p last_block
$16 = 4088
(gdb) p local->first_block
$17 = 4087
(gdb) p odirect
$18 = _gf_false
(gdb) p fd->flags
$19 = 2
(gdb) p local->call_count
$20 = 2


If you need more core dumps, i have several files i can upload.

--

Respectfully
Mahdi A. Mahdi



From: kdhananj@xxxxxxxxxx
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2016 18:39:27 +0530
Subject: Re: Gluster 3.7.13 NFS Crash
To: mahdi.adnan@xxxxxxxxxxx
CC: gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx

Sorry I didn't make myself  clear. The reason I asked YOU to do it is because i tried it on my system and im not getting the backtrace (it's all question marks).

Attach the core to gdb.
At the gdb prompt, go to frame 2 by typing
(gdb) f 2

There, for each of the variables i asked you to get the values of, type p followed by the variable name.
For instance, to get the value of the variable 'odirect', do this:

(gdb) p odirect

and gdb will print its value for you in response.

-Krutika

On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 4:55 PM, Mahdi Adnan <mahdi.adnan@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi,

How to get the results of the below variables ? i cant get the results from gdb.


--

Respectfully
Mahdi A. Mahdi



From: kdhananj@xxxxxxxxxx
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2016 15:51:38 +0530
Subject: Re: Gluster 3.7.13 NFS Crash
To: mahdi.adnan@xxxxxxxxxxx
CC: gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx


Could you also print and share the values of the following variables from the backtrace please:

i. cur_block
ii. last_block
iii. local->first_block
iv. odirect
v. fd->flags
vi. local->call_count

-Krutika

On Sat, Jul 30, 2016 at 5:04 PM, Mahdi Adnan <mahdi.adnan@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi,

I really appreciate if someone can help me fix my nfs crash, its happening a lot and it's causing lots of issues to my VMs;
the problem is every few hours the native nfs crash and the volume become unavailable from the affected node unless i restart glusterd.
the volume is used by vmware esxi as a datastore for it's VMs with the following options;


OS: CentOS 7.2
Gluster: 3.7.13

Volume Name: vlm01
Type: Distributed-Replicate
Volume ID: eacd8248-dca3-4530-9aed-7714a5a114f2
Status: Started
Number of Bricks: 7 x 3 = 21
Transport-type: tcp
Bricks:
Brick1: gfs01:/bricks/b01/vlm01
Brick2: gfs02:/bricks/b01/vlm01
Brick3: gfs03:/bricks/b01/vlm01
Brick4: gfs01:/bricks/b02/vlm01
Brick5: gfs02:/bricks/b02/vlm01
Brick6: gfs03:/bricks/b02/vlm01
Brick7: gfs01:/bricks/b03/vlm01
Brick8: gfs02:/bricks/b03/vlm01
Brick9: gfs03:/bricks/b03/vlm01
Brick10: gfs01:/bricks/b04/vlm01
Brick11: gfs02:/bricks/b04/vlm01
Brick12: gfs03:/bricks/b04/vlm01
Brick13: gfs01:/bricks/b05/vlm01
Brick14: gfs02:/bricks/b05/vlm01
Brick15: gfs03:/bricks/b05/vlm01
Brick16: gfs01:/bricks/b06/vlm01
Brick17: gfs02:/bricks/b06/vlm01
Brick18: gfs03:/bricks/b06/vlm01
Brick19: gfs01:/bricks/b07/vlm01
Brick20: gfs02:/bricks/b07/vlm01
Brick21: gfs03:/bricks/b07/vlm01
Options Reconfigured:
performance.readdir-ahead: off
performance.quick-read: off
performance.read-ahead: off
performance.io-cache: off
performance.stat-prefetch: off
cluster.eager-lock: enable
network.remote-dio: enable
cluster.quorum-type: auto
cluster.server-quorum-type: server
performance.strict-write-ordering: on
performance.write-behind: off
cluster.data-self-heal-algorithm: full
cluster.self-heal-window-size: 128
features.shard-block-size: 16MB
features.shard: on
auth.allow: 192.168.221.50,192.168.221.51,192.168.221.52,192.168.221.56,192.168.208.130,192.168.208.131,192.168.208.132,192.168.208.89,192.168.208.85,192.168.208.208.86
network.ping-timeout: 10


latest bt;


(gdb) bt 
#0  0x00007f196acab210 in pthread_spin_lock () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0
#1  0x00007f196be7bcd5 in fd_anonymous (inode=0x0) at fd.c:804
#2  0x00007f195deb1787 in shard_common_inode_write_do (frame=0x7f19699f1164, this=0x7f195802ac10) at shard.c:3716
#3  0x00007f195deb1a53 in shard_common_inode_write_post_lookup_shards_handler (frame=<optimized out>, this=<optimized out>) at shard.c:3769
#4  0x00007f195deaaff5 in shard_common_lookup_shards_cbk (frame=0x7f19699f1164, cookie=<optimized out>, this=0x7f195802ac10, op_ret=0, 
    op_errno=<optimized out>, inode=<optimized out>, buf=0x7f194970bc40, xdata=0x7f196c15451c, postparent=0x7f194970bcb0) at shard.c:1601
#5  0x00007f195e10a141 in dht_lookup_cbk (frame=0x7f196998e7d4, cookie=<optimized out>, this=<optimized out>, op_ret=0, op_errno=0, inode=0x7f195c532b18, 
    stbuf=0x7f194970bc40, xattr=0x7f196c15451c, postparent=0x7f194970bcb0) at dht-common.c:2174
#6  0x00007f195e3931f3 in afr_lookup_done (frame=frame@entry=0x7f196997f8a4, this=this@entry=0x7f1958022a20) at afr-common.c:1825
#7  0x00007f195e393b84 in afr_lookup_metadata_heal_check (frame=frame@entry=0x7f196997f8a4, this=0x7f1958022a20, this@entry=0xe3a929e0b67fa500)
    at afr-common.c:2068
#8  0x00007f195e39434f in afr_lookup_entry_heal (frame=frame@entry=0x7f196997f8a4, this=0xe3a929e0b67fa500, this@entry=0x7f1958022a20) at afr-common.c:2157
#9  0x00007f195e39467d in afr_lookup_cbk (frame=0x7f196997f8a4, cookie=<optimized out>, this=0x7f1958022a20, op_ret=<optimized out>, 
    op_errno=<optimized out>, inode=<optimized out>, buf=0x7f195effa940, xdata=0x7f196c1853b0, postparent=0x7f195effa9b0) at afr-common.c:2205
#10 0x00007f195e5e2e42 in client3_3_lookup_cbk (req=<optimized out>, iov=<optimized out>, count=<optimized out>, myframe=0x7f196999952c)
    at client-rpc-fops.c:2981
#11 0x00007f196bc0ca30 in rpc_clnt_handle_reply (clnt=clnt@entry=0x7f19583adaf0, pollin=pollin@entry=0x7f195907f930) at rpc-clnt.c:764
#12 0x00007f196bc0ccef in rpc_clnt_notify (trans=<optimized out>, mydata=0x7f19583adb20, event=<optimized out>, data="" at rpc-clnt.c:925
#13 0x00007f196bc087c3 in rpc_transport_notify (this=this@entry=0x7f19583bd770, event=event@entry=RPC_TRANSPORT_MSG_RECEIVED, data="">)
    at rpc-transport.c:546
#14 0x00007f1960acf9a4 in socket_event_poll_in (this=this@entry=0x7f19583bd770) at socket.c:2353
#15 0x00007f1960ad25e4 in socket_event_handler (fd=fd@entry=25, idx=idx@entry=14, data="" poll_in=1, poll_out=0, poll_err=0) at socket.c:2466
#16 0x00007f196beacf7a in event_dispatch_epoll_handler (event=0x7f195effae80, event_pool=0x7f196dbf5f20) at event-epoll.c:575
#17 event_dispatch_epoll_worker (data="" at event-epoll.c:678
#18 0x00007f196aca6dc5 in start_thread () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0
#19 0x00007f196a5ebced in clone () from /lib64/libc.so.6




nfs logs and the core dump can be found in the dropbox link below;


thanks in advance.

Respectfully
Mahdi A. Mahdi


_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users



_______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users

_______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users







_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Development]     [Linux Filesytems Development]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux