Hi,
Considering all the other factor same for both the configuration, yes small configuration
would take less time. To read good copies, it will take less time.
I think, multi threaded shd is the only enhancement in near future.
Ashish
From: "Serkan Çoban" <cobanserkan@xxxxxxxxx>
To: "Gluster Users" <gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, August 8, 2016 4:02:22 PM
Subject: ec heal questions
Hi,
Assume we have 8+2 and 16+4 ec configurations and we just replaced a
broken disk in each configuration which has 100GB of data. In which
case heal completes faster? Does heal speed has anything related with
ec configuration?
Assume we are in 16+4 ec configuration. When heal starts it reads 16
chunks from other bricks recompute our chunks and writes it to just
replaced disk. Am I correct?
If above assumption is true then small ec configurations heals faster right?
Is there any improvements in 3.7.14+ that makes ec heal faster?(Other
than multi-thread shd for ec)
Thanks,
Serkan
_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
To: "Gluster Users" <gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, August 8, 2016 4:02:22 PM
Subject: ec heal questions
broken disk in each configuration which has 100GB of data. In which
case heal completes faster? Does heal speed has anything related with
ec configuration?
chunks from other bricks recompute our chunks and writes it to just
replaced disk. Am I correct?
than multi-thread shd for ec)
Serkan
_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
_______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
