On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 11:02 PM, Atin Mukherjee <amukherj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 8:02 AM, David Gossage <dgossage@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:M, David Gossage <dgossage@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:Is their a way to reduce logging of informational spam?/var/log/glusterfs/bricks/gluster1-BRICK1-1.log is now 3GB over past few days[2016-07-14 00:54:35.267018] I [dict.c:473:dict_get] (-->/lib64/libglusterfs.so.0(default_getxattr_cbk+0xac) [0x7fcdc396dcbc] -->/usr/lib64/glusterfs/3.7.11/xlator/features/marker.so(marker_getxattr_cbk+0xa7) [0x7fcdafde5917] -->/lib64/libglusterfs.so.0(dict_get+0xac) [0x7fcdc395e0fc] ) 0-dict: !this || key=() [Invalid argument][2016-07-14 00:54:35.272945] I [dict.c:473:dict_get] (-->/lib64/libglusterfs.so.0(default_getxattr_cbk+0xac) [0x7fcdc396dcbc] -->/usr/lib64/glusterfs/3.7.11/xlator/features/marker.so(marker_getxattr_cbk+0xa7) [0x7fcdafde5917] -->/lib64/libglusterfs.so.0(dict_get+0xac) [0x7fcdc395e0fc] ) 0-dict: !this || key=() [Invalid argument]
@Mani, Is this something which get logged in a normal scenario? I doubt.
I did find a bug report about it presumably being fixed in 3.8.
I also currently have a node down which may be triggering them.
Believe I found itgluster volume set testvol diagnostics.brick-log-level WARNINGDavid Gossage
Carousel Checks Inc. | System Administrator
Office 708.613.2284
_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
----Atin
_______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users