Re: 3.7.13, index healing broken?

[Dmitry Melekhov <dm@xxxxxxxxxx>]

13.07.2016 09:19, Pranith Kumar Karampuri пишет:

On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 10:41 AM, Dmitry Melekhov <dm@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

13.07.2016 09:09, Lindsay Mathieson пишет:

On 13 July 2016 at 15:06, Dmitry Melekhov <dm@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

zfs repairs deleted files? wow! :-D

File corruptions (if you have zfs raid configured), which I presumed
you were referring to.

There is only so much a system can do to protect users against
themselves, If you insist on deleting underlying files on a brick and
not triggering a full heal then I suggest you have crossed that line.

There are two types of corruption:

1. hardware failure, to prevent this we use hardware raid6 right now, this is quite good, imho;
2. human errors, this is what I'm talking about here.

I think classic solution for human errors is snapshots. Which is present in gluster. Feel free to give us feedback.

ooh :-(

If gluster heals files on access why it does not heal them during self-heal process? Is this really self-heal?

And snapshots are on different level- they save gluster volume at whole, not from bricks difference....

_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users