Re: self healing with sharding

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 8/07/2016 8:40 PM, Gandalf Corvotempesta wrote:
If performance would be the same with 10MB shard or 100MB shard, the
10MB is better because allows a faster healing.

Depends on what performance measures you use. In my ad hoc testing, my impressions where that large seq read/write slowed down as shard size shrunk, but oddly, random i/o actually increased.


For me, the happy medium is 64MB. But it will depend on your workload.

--
Lindsay Mathieson

_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users



[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Development]     [Linux Filesytems Development]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux