Re: to RAID or not?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2016-07-04 19:44 GMT+02:00 Gandalf Corvotempesta
<gandalf.corvotempesta@xxxxxxxxx>:
> So, any disk failure would me at least 6TB to be recovered via
> network. This mean an high network utilization and as long gluster
> doesn't have a dedicated network for replica,
> this can slow down client access.

Additionally, using a RAID-0 doesn't give any fault tollerance.
My question was for archieving the bast redundancy and data proction
available. If I have to use RAID-0 that doesn't protect data, why not
removing raid at all ?
_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users



[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Development]     [Linux Filesytems Development]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux