Re: to RAID or not?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2016-07-04 19:25 GMT+02:00 Matt Robinson <m.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> If you don't trust the hardware raid, then steer clear of raid-6 as mdadm raid 6 is stupidly slow.
> I don't completely trust hardware raid either, but rebuild times should be under a day and in order to lose a raid-6 array you have to lose 3 disks.
> My own systems are hardware raid-6.
> If you're not terribly worried about maximising usable storage, then mdadm raid-10 is your friend.

All of my servers are hardware RAID-6 with 8x300GB SAS 15K (some
servers with 600GB)

A rebuild of a single disk in a 6x600GB SAS RAID-6 takes exactly 22 hours.

This with 15K SAS disks. Now try with 2TB (more than twice the size)
SATA 7200 (less than half speed)
_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users



[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Development]     [Linux Filesytems Development]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux