2016-06-14 0:05 GMT+02:00 Kevin Lemonnier <lemonnierk@xxxxxxxxx>: > Yep, using it with proxmox so it's qemu. > Performances seems good, but it does depend on the setup. > I know currently our production cluster is using 3.7.6 on 3 nodes > across 2 datacenters, with 10ms ping between them. Seemed mostly fine > at first but a client complained about performances, so I installed > a 3.7.11 cluster between 3 nodes across two datacenters closer together > (same town so not much ping between) and did some testing, it's a lot better > and the client was happy. > I don't know how much the update contributed, but I assume the ping is > playing a bit part in this. Are you willing to share your hardware/network configuration? We are planning a cluster similiar to yours. > I could send you the bonnie++ results from those two tests tomorrow if you want, > kept that at work. Yes, this could be interested. If possible, could you please share some benchmark for the same VM running from gluster and running directly from localstorage ? What i've read is that with native gluster connector for QEMU performance are almost identical to the plain qemu (this looks pretty strange to me) _______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
