Oleksandr,
Could you take statedump of the shd process once in 5-10 minutes and send may be 5 samples of them when it starts to increase? This will help us find what datatypes are being allocated a lot and can lead to coming up with possible theories for the increase.
Could you take statedump of the shd process once in 5-10 minutes and send may be 5 samples of them when it starts to increase? This will help us find what datatypes are being allocated a lot and can lead to coming up with possible theories for the increase.
On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 12:03 PM, Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Also, I've checked shd log files, and found out that for some reason shd constantly reconnects to bricks: [1]
Please note that suggested fix [2] by Pranith does not help, VIRT value still grows:
===
root 1010 0.0 9.6 7415248 374688 ? Ssl чер07 0:14 /usr/sbin/glusterfs -s localhost --volfile-id gluster/glustershd -p /var/lib/glusterd/glustershd/run/glustershd.pid -l /var/log/glusterfs/glustershd.log -S /var/run/gluster/7848e17764dd4ba80f4623aecb91b07a.socket --xlator-option *replicate*.node-uuid=80bc95e1-2027-4a96-bb66-d9c8ade624d7
===
I do not know the reason why it is reconnecting, but I suspect leak to happen on that reconnect.
CCing Pranith.
[1] http://termbin.com/brob
[2] http://review.gluster.org/#/c/14053/
06.06.2016 12:21, Kaushal M написав:
Has multi-threaded SHD been merged into 3.7.* by any chance? If not,
what I'm saying below doesn't apply.
We saw problems when encrypted transports were used, because the RPC
layer was not reaping threads (doing pthread_join) when a connection
ended. This lead to similar observations of huge VIRT and relatively
small RSS.
I'm not sure how multi-threaded shd works, but it could be leaking
threads in a similar way.
On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 1:54 PM, Oleksandr Natalenko
<oleksandr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hello.
We use v3.7.11, replica 2 setup between 2 nodes + 1 dummy node for keeping
volumes metadata.
Now we observe huge VSZ (VIRT) usage by glustershd on dummy node:
===
root 15109 0.0 13.7 76552820 535272 ? Ssl тра26 2:11
/usr/sbin/glusterfs -s localhost --volfile-id gluster/glustershd -p
/var/lib/glusterd/glustershd/run/glustershd.pid -l
/var/log/glusterfs/glustershd.log -S
/var/run/gluster/7848e17764dd4ba80f4623aecb91b07a.socket --xlator-option
*replicate*.node-uuid=80bc95e1-2027-4a96-bb66-d9c8ade624d7
===
that is ~73G. RSS seems to be OK (~522M). Here is the statedump of
glustershd process: [1]
Also, here is sum of sizes, presented in statedump:
===
# cat /var/run/gluster/glusterdump.15109.dump.1465200139 | awk -F '=' 'BEGIN
{sum=0} /^size=/ {sum+=$2} END {print sum}'
353276406
===
That is ~337 MiB.
Also, here are VIRT values from 2 replica nodes:
===
root 24659 0.0 0.3 5645836 451796 ? Ssl тра24 3:28
/usr/sbin/glusterfs -s localhost --volfile-id gluster/glustershd -p
/var/lib/glusterd/glustershd/run/glustershd.pid -l
/var/log/glusterfs/glustershd.log -S
/var/run/gluster/44ec3f29003eccedf894865107d5db90.socket --xlator-option
*replicate*.node-uuid=a19afcc2-e26c-43ce-bca6-d27dc1713e87
root 18312 0.0 0.3 6137500 477472 ? Ssl тра19 6:37
/usr/sbin/glusterfs -s localhost --volfile-id gluster/glustershd -p
/var/lib/glusterd/glustershd/run/glustershd.pid -l
/var/log/glusterfs/glustershd.log -S
/var/run/gluster/1670a3abbd1eea968126eb6f5be20322.socket --xlator-option
*replicate*.node-uuid=52dca21b-c81c-48b5-9de2-1ed37987fbc2
===
Those are 5 to 6G, which is much less than dummy node has, but still look
too big for us.
Should we care about huge VIRT value on dummy node? Also, how one would
debug that?
Regards,
Oleksandr.
[1] https://gist.github.com/d2cfa25251136512580220fcdb8a6ce6
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
--
Pranith
_______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
