On Mon, May 09, 2016 at 02:26:27PM -0400, Vijay Bellur wrote: > On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 2:01 PM, Amye Scavarda <amye@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > On Sun, May 8, 2016 at 11:50 PM, Raghavendra Talur <rtalur@xxxxxxxxxx> > > wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >> On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 11:55 AM, Atin Mukherjee <amukherj@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> In the view of keeping the visibility of the work completed vs work in > >>> progress and getting some fruitful feedback from the community we are > >>> thinking of having a hangout/bluejeans session for 30-45 minutes once in > >>> every month. The sessions will be concentrating on discussing the work > >>> done over the last month and demoing few pieces of Gluster 4.0 projects > >>> and what's the expectation for the coming month(s). > >>> > >>> There are couple of options we have w.r.t scheduling these sessions. > >>> > >>> 1. We use the weekly community meeting slot once in a month > >>> or 2. Have a dedicated separate slot (probably @ 12:00 UTC, last > >>> Thursday of each month) > >> > >> > >> I would prefer dedicated time slot. > >> > >>> > >>> > >>> I'd request you to vote for any of these two and based on that we can > >>> move forward. > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> Atin > > > > > > If we use a dedicated timeslot of 12:00 UTC, we'll never be able to have > > folks from Pacific weigh in. > > I'd suggest more of a rotating timeslot, but we've not had good luck getting > > traction around that. > > - amye > > > > +1 to this. How about 1500 UTC? That should give time zones where we > have more presence (North America, Europe, India) an equal chance to > be present. > > I think accommodating one more meeting in everybody's busy schedules > might be tough. We already have 4 bug triage meetings and 4 community > meetings in a month. Adding one more might cause us to spread > ourselves thin across these meetings. How about not doing a community > or bug triage meeting in the same week when we schedule this meeting? I prefer an additional meeting, recorded and all. Not everyone would need to join the meeting about the new feature, reading the notes or watching a recording would work for many. The number of people attending the Bug Triage meeting can unfortunately be counted on one hand most times :-/ Until all maintainers and developers working on components do not triage the bugs themselves, I do not like to delay responses to bug reporters longer than a week (which is already stretching it for a 1st action). The weekly community meetins are visited well, if the discussions there are not productive/important enough to have every week, I would suggest to use that slot. > We could turn this meeting into a Gluster.next meeting so that > everybody who is working on something new in Gluster gets a chance to > showcase their work. Yeah, that sounds good. A schedule about whan what feature is discussed or presented would be helpful :) Thanks, Niels
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users