On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 5:28 AM, Prasanna Kalever <pkalever@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > If we see the ephemeral port standards > 1. The Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) suggests the range > 49152 to 65535 > 2. Many Linux kernels use the port range 32768 to 61000 > more at [2] > > Some of our thoughts include split the current brick port range ( ~16K > ) into two (may be ~8K each or some other ratio) and use them for > client and bricks, which could solve the problem but also introduce a > limitation for scalability. > I would recommend providing the administrator an ability to override any logic that we use to implement this behavior. > The patch [1] goes in 3.1.3, we wanted know if there are any impacts > caused with these changes. > > > [1] http://review.gluster.org/#/c/13998/ I would have ideally liked the patch to have spent some time in the review queue after this email was sent. It does look like the patch got merged within 2 hours after the email was sent. This interval is grossly inadequate if you are looking to obtain any feedback that can add value. Nevertheless I have provided my comments on the patchset. Please incorporate them in a subsequent commit. Regards, Vijay _______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
