Hi Brian, Thanks for reporting the issue. Could you please post the geo-replication logs? It would help us find out why geo-replication has failed to sync. You can find master geo-rep logs under /var/log/glusterfs/geo-replication and slave logs under /var/log/glusterfs/geo-replication-slaves Thanks and Regards, Kotresh H R ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Brian Litzinger" <brian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > To: gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx > Sent: Saturday, April 30, 2016 2:01:14 AM > Subject: geo-replication going offline in 3.5 and 3.6 with 30 days > > Sorry if this is a double post. > > I ran geo-replication with gluster 3.4 for about a year without any issues. > > I have tried the same setup with 3.5 and 3.6 (with gluster volumes at > both end) and in both cases the geo-replication failed silently within about > 30 days. > > The various gluster status commands reported that all was well in 3.5 and > 3.6, > but the data was no longer geo-replicating. > > Looking in the logs and when the geo-replication was no longer reflected in > the > geo-replica filesystem this line from the logs looks suspicious: > > (this was 7 days after the geo-replication had been started) > > [2016-04-11 16:04:37.997284] E [iobuf.c:733:iobuf_unref] > (-->/usr/local/lib/libglusterfs.so.0(call_resume+0x5cc) [0x7f168605c6fc] > (-->/usr/local/lib/libglusterfs.so.0(default_readv_resume+0x14c) > [0x7f1686042d1c] > (-->/usr/local/lib/glusterfs/3.5.9/xlator/performance/quick-read.so(qr_readv+0x4c) > [0x7f167b7d126c]))) 0-iobuf: invalid argument: iobuf > > [2016-04-11 16:04:37.997314] E [iobuf.c:839:iobref_unref] > (-->/usr/local/lib/libglusterfs.so.0(call_resume+0x5cc) [0x7f168605c6fc] > (-->/usr/local/lib/libglusterfs.so.0(default_readv_resume+0x14c) > [0x7f1686042d1c] > (-->/usr/local/lib/glusterfs/3.5.9/xlator/performance/quick-read.so(qr_readv+0x4c) > [0x7f167b7d126c]))) 0-iobuf: invalid argument: iobref > > Some of the issues worth exploring are: > > 1) Why did it stop geo-replicating? > > 2) Why was this failure not reflected in the status commands? > > 3) Should I stick with 3.4 until the "production" label is > applied to a later version? > > -- > brian > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-users mailing list > Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx > http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users > _______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
