Re: What is the corresponding op-version for a glusterfs release?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 04/19/2016 05:42 PM, Atin Mukherjee wrote:
>> After a brief search, I discovered the following solution for RHGS: https://access.redhat.com/solutions/2050753 It suggests updating the op-version of the cluster after the upgrade. There isn't any evidence of this procedure in the community documentation (except for in this mailing list).
>> > 
>> > Unfortunately, nor 30709 or 30708 are valid op-version so I moved to 30707:
> Although the op-version numbering is aligned with the release versions
> but that doesn't go as a strict rule. If any new volume tunable option
> is introduced between the release then the op-version is bumped up.
> Between 3.7.7 and 3.7.9 releases there were no new options introduced
> and hence the op-version goes as 30707 for 3.7.9 release.


Curious, is there any reason why this isn't automatically updated when
managing the updates with "yum update"?

Just checked my system and it was set to "operating-version=2" even
though I have been on 3.7.x for awhile and just updated to 3.7.11.

I just ran "gluster volume set all cluster.op-version 30710" successfully.

What have I been missing all these years?  :-)

Thanks,

-Dj


_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users



[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Development]     [Linux Filesytems Development]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux