On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 8:02 PM, Kevin Lemonnier <lemonnierk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I will try migrating to 3.7.10, is it considered stable yet ?
Oops, just realized 3.7.10 had a regression. Then 3.7.11 it is. :)
Should I change the self heal algorithm even if I move to 3.7.10, or is that not necessary ?
Not sure what that change might do.
So the other algorithm is 'diff' which computes rolling checksum on chunks of the src(es) and sink(s), compares them and heals upon mismatch. This is known to consume lot of CPU. 'full' algo on the other hand simply copies the src into sink in chunks. With sharding, it shouldn't be all that bad copying a 256MB file (in your case) from src to sink. We've used double the block size and had no issues reported.
So you could change self heal algo to full even in the upgraded cluster.
-Krutika
Anyway, I'll try to create a 3.7.10 cluster in the week end slowly move the VMs on it then,
Thanks a lot for your help,
Regards
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 07:58:44PM +0530, Krutika Dhananjay wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Yeah, so the fuse mount log didn't convey much information.
>
> So one of the reasons heal may have taken so long (and also consumed
> resources) is because of a bug in self-heal where it would do heal from
> both source bricks in 3-way replication. With such a bug, heal would take
> twice the amount of time and consume resources both the times by the same
> amount.
>
> This issue is fixed at http://review.gluster.org/#/c/14008/ and will be
> available in 3.7.12.
>
> The other thing you could do is to set cluster.data-self-heal-algorithm to
> 'full', for better heal performance and more regulated resource consumption
> by the same.
> #gluster volume set <VOL> cluster.data-self-heal-algorithm full
>
> As far as sharding is concerned, some critical caching issues were fixed in
> 3.7.7 and 3.7.8.
> And my guess is that the vm crash/unbootable state could be because of this
> issue, which exists in 3.7.6.
>
> 3.7.10 saw the introduction of throttled client side heals which also moves
> such heals to the background, which is all the more helpful for preventing
> starvation of vms during client heal.
>
> Considering these factors, I think it would be better if you upgraded your
> machines to 3.7.10.
>
> Do let me know if migrating to 3.7.10 solves your issues.
>
> -Krutika
>
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 12:40 PM, Kevin Lemonnier <lemonnierk@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> > Yes, but as I was saying I don't believe KVM is using a mount point, I
> > think it uses
> > the API (
> > http://www.gluster.org/community/documentation/index.php/Libgfapi_with_qemu_libvirt
> > ).
> > Might be mistaken ofcourse. Proxmox does have a mountpoint for
> > conveniance, I'll attach those
> > logs, hoping they contain the informations you need. They do seem to
> > contain a lot of errors
> > for the 15.
> > For reference, there was a disconnect of the first brick (10.10.0.1) in
> > the morning and then a successfull
> > heal that caused about 40 minutes downtime of the VMs. Right after that
> > heal finished (if my memory is
> > correct it was about noon or close) the second brick (10.10.0.2) rebooted,
> > and that's the one I disconnected
> > to prevent the heal from causing another downtime.
> > I reconnected it one at the end of the afternoon, hoping the heal would go
> > well but everything went down
> > like in the morning so I disconnected it again, and waited 11pm (23:00) to
> > reconnect it and let it finish.
> >
> > Thanks for your help,
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 12:28:28PM +0530, Krutika Dhananjay wrote:
> > > Sorry, I was referring to the glusterfs client logs.
> > >
> > > Assuming you are using FUSE mount, your log file will be in
> > > /var/log/glusterfs/<hyphenated-mount-point-path>.log
> > >
> > > -Krutika
> > >
> > > On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 9:37 PM, Kevin Lemonnier <lemonnierk@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > I believe Proxmox is just an interface to KVM that uses the lib, so if
> > I'm
> > > > not mistaken there isn't client logs ?
> > > >
> > > > It's not the first time I have the issue, it happens on every heal on
> > the
> > > > 2 clusters I have.
> > > >
> > > > I did let the heal finish that night and the VMs are working now, but
> > it
> > > > is pretty scarry for future crashes or brick replacement.
> > > > Should I maybe lower the shard size ? Won't solve the fact that 2
> > bricks
> > > > on 3 aren't keeping the filesystem usable but might make the healing
> > > > quicker right ?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks
> > > >
> > > > Le 17 avril 2016 17:56:37 GMT+02:00, Krutika Dhananjay <
> > > > kdhananj@xxxxxxxxxx> a écrit :
> > > > >Could you share the client logs and information about the approx
> > > > >time/day
> > > > >when you saw this issue?
> > > > >
> > > > >-Krutika
> > > > >
> > > > >On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 12:57 AM, Kevin Lemonnier
> > > > ><lemonnierk@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > > >wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> Hi,
> > > > >>
> > > > >> We have a small glusterFS 3.7.6 cluster with 3 nodes running with
> > > > >proxmox
> > > > >> VM's on it. I did set up the different recommended option like the
> > > > >virt
> > > > >> group, but
> > > > >> by hand since it's on debian. The shards are 256MB, if that matters.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> This morning the second node crashed, and as it came back up started
> > > > >a
> > > > >> heal, but that basically froze all the VM's running on that volume.
> > > > >Since
> > > > >> we really really
> > > > >> can't have 40 minutes down time in the middle of the day, I just
> > > > >removed
> > > > >> the node from the network and that stopped the heal, allowing the
> > > > >VM's to
> > > > >> access
> > > > >> their disks again. The plan was to re-connecte the node in a couple
> > > > >of
> > > > >> hours to let it heal at night.
> > > > >> But a VM crashed now, and it can't boot up again : seems to freez
> > > > >trying
> > > > >> to access the disks.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Looking at the heal info for the volume, it has gone way up since
> > > > >this
> > > > >> morning, it looks like the VM's aren't writing to both nodes, just
> > > > >the one
> > > > >> they are on.
> > > > >> It seems pretty bad, we have 2 nodes on 3 up, I would expect the
> > > > >volume to
> > > > >> work just fine since it has quorum. What am I missing ?
> > > > >>
> > > > >> It is still too early to start the heal, is there a way to start the
> > > > >VM
> > > > >> anyway right now ? I mean, it was running a moment ago so the data
> > is
> > > > >> there, it just needs
> > > > >> to let the VM access it.
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Volume Name: vm-storage
> > > > >> Type: Replicate
> > > > >> Volume ID: a5b19324-f032-4136-aaac-5e9a4c88aaef
> > > > >> Status: Started
> > > > >> Number of Bricks: 1 x 3 = 3
> > > > >> Transport-type: tcp
> > > > >> Bricks:
> > > > >> Brick1: first_node:/mnt/vg1-storage
> > > > >> Brick2: second_node:/mnt/vg1-storage
> > > > >> Brick3: third_node:/mnt/vg1-storage
> > > > >> Options Reconfigured:
> > > > >> cluster.quorum-type: auto
> > > > >> cluster.server-quorum-type: server
> > > > >> network.remote-dio: enable
> > > > >> cluster.eager-lock: enable
> > > > >> performance.readdir-ahead: on
> > > > >> performance.quick-read: off
> > > > >> performance.read-ahead: off
> > > > >> performance.io-cache: off
> > > > >> performance.stat-prefetch: off
> > > > >> features.shard: on
> > > > >> features.shard-block-size: 256MB
> > > > >> cluster.server-quorum-ratio: 51%
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Thanks for your help
> > > > >>
> > > > >> --
> > > > >> Kevin Lemonnier
> > > > >> PGP Fingerprint : 89A5 2283 04A0 E6E9 0111
> > > > >>
> > > > >> _______________________________________________
> > > > >> Gluster-users mailing list
> > > > >> Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > >> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Envoyé de mon appareil Android avec K-9 Mail. Veuillez excuser ma
> > brièveté.
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Gluster-users mailing list
> > > > Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
> > > >
> >
> > --
> > Kevin Lemonnier
> > PGP Fingerprint : 89A5 2283 04A0 E6E9 0111
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Gluster-users mailing list
> > Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
> >
--
Kevin Lemonnier
PGP Fingerprint : 89A5 2283 04A0 E6E9 0111
_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
_______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
