On 18 April 2016 at 13:35, Gmail <b.s.mikhael@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I’ve tried more than one volume on the same Zpool, but with separate ZFS > share for every volume. I didn’t find any performance issues compared to XFS > on LVM. > Thanks Bishoy, good to know > > PS: ZFS by default stores the extended attributes in a hidden directory > instead of extending the file inode size like what XFS do! Yah, I've got xattr=sa aacltype set, also atime off and compression=lz4. Compression is a big plus, it has no impact in performance that I've noted and I can roughly 30% more space from it. -- Lindsay _______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
