Ravi, I will definitely arrange the results into some short handy
document and post it here.
Also, @JoeJulian on IRC suggested me to perform this test on XFS bricks
with inode size of 256b and 1k:
===
22:38 <@JoeJulian> post-factum: Just wondering what 256 byte inodes
might look like for that. And, by the same token, 1k inodes.
22:39 < post-factum> JoeJulian: should I try 1k inodes instead?
22:41 <@JoeJulian> post-factum: Doesn't hurt to try. My expectation is
that disk usage will go up despite inode usage going down.
22:41 < post-factum> JoeJulian: ok, will check that
22:41 <@JoeJulian> post-factum: and with 256, I'm curious if inode usage
will stay close to the same while disk usage goes down.
===
Here are the results for 1k:
(1171336 - 33000) / (1066036 - 23) == 1068 bytes per inode.
Disk usage is indeed higher (1.2G), but inodes usage is the same.
Will test with 256b inode now.
17.03.2016 06:28, Ravishankar N wrote:
Looks okay to me Oleksandr. You might want to make a github gist of
your tests+results as a reference for others.
_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
