-Atin
Sent from one plus one
On 19-Feb-2016 7:47 pm, "Atin Mukherjee" <atin.mukherjee83@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Abhilash has already raised a concern and Gaurav is looking into it.
My bad, he is Abhishek!
>
> -Atin
> Sent from one plus one
>
> On 19-Feb-2016 7:07 pm, "songxin" <songxin_1980@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I create a replicate volume with 2 brick.And I frequently reboot my two nodes and frequently run “peer detach” “peer detach” “add-brick” "remove-brick".
>>
>> A borad ip: 10.32.0.48
>>
>> B borad ip: 10.32.1.144
>>
>>
>> After that, I run "gluster peer status" on A board and it show as below.
>>
>> Number of Peers: 2
>>
>> Hostname: 10.32.1.144
>> Uuid: bbe2a458-ad3d-406d-b233-b6027c12174e
>> State: Peer in Cluster (Connected)
>>
>> Hostname: 10.32.1.144
>> Uuid: bbe2a458-ad3d-406d-b233-b6027c12174e
>> State: Peer in Cluster (Connected)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> I don't understand why the 10.32.0.48 has two peers which are both 10.32.1.144.
>>
>> Does glusterd not check duplicate ip addr？
>>
>> Any can help me to answer my quesion?
>>
>>
>> Thanks，
>>
>> Xin
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Gluster-users mailing list
>> Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
_______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
