Re: [Gluster-devel] GlusterFS v3.7.8 client leaks summary — part II

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 02/16/2016 08:06 PM, Oleksandr Natalenko wrote:
Hmm, OK. I've rechecked 3.7.8 with the following patches (latest
revisions):

===
Soumya Koduri (3):
       gfapi: Use inode_forget in case of handle objects
       inode: Retire the inodes from the lru list in inode_table_destroy
       rpc: Fix for rpc_transport_t leak
===

Here is Valgrind output: [1]

It seems that all leaks are gone, and that is very nice.

At least major chunk of leaks seem to have gone. Many thanks to you too for very detailed tests and analysis :)

-Soumya


Many thanks to all devs.

[1] https://gist.github.com/anonymous/eddfdaf3eb7bff458326

16.02.2016 15:30, Soumya Koduri wrote:
I have tested using your API app (I/Os done - create,write and stat).
I still do not see any inode related leaks. However I posted another
fix for rpc_transport object related leak [1].

I request you to re-check if you have the latest patch of [2] applied
in your build.

[1] http://review.gluster.org/#/c/13456/
[2] http://review.gluster.org/#/c/13125/
_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users



[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Development]     [Linux Filesytems Development]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux