Re: Gluster FS in a docker container

[prmarino1@xxxxxxxxx]

Last I looked as far as RHEL is concerned btrfs tech preview.

What that means is there may be stability issues on RHEL and or their support team isn't trained in it yet.  So you're experience may not be a good one even if the underlying technology is sound.

From: Joe Julian‎

Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2016 17:44‎

To: gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx

Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] Gluster FS in a docker container

... and I somewhat disagree with that assessment of btrfs.

On 01/26/2016 02:15 PM, Raghavendra Bhat wrote:

Hi Laurent,

You can use either xfs or ext4 as the backend filesystem.

Regards,

Raghavendra

On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 11:10 AM, Laurent Le Van <laurent.levan@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hello everyone,

I'm trying to use GlusterFS in a Docker Container but volume creation doesn't work.

I'm facing the "Setting extended attributes failed".I saw in several forum that the aufs file system use by default is the problem and an alternative is to use btrfs. But because I want to use it for a in "production use" purpose, isn't there another solution ? I heard btrfs is not safe for production at the moment.  And all the post forum i saw is a few years old now (2014-2013) .

Any suggestion ?

Thank you,

Laurent

Student in Computer Science,

trainee at Docdoku.

_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users

_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users

_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users