Re: Sharding - what next?

Lindsay Mathieson <lindsay.mathieson@xxxxxxxxx> · Wed, 9 Dec 2015 23:18:40 +1000



    Hi Guys, sorry for the late reply, my attention tends to be somewhat
    sporadic due to work and the large number of rescue dogs/cats I care
    for :)

    
    On 3/12/2015 8:34 PM, Krutika Dhananjay
      wrote:

    
      We would love to hear from you on what you think of the
        feature and where it could be improved.

      
      Specifically, the following are the questions we are seeking
        feedback on:

      
      a) your experience testing sharding with VM store use-case -
        any bugs you ran into, any performance issues, etc

      
    Testing was initially somewhat stressful as I regularly encountered
    file corruption. However I don't think that was due to bugs, rather
    incorrect settings for the VM usecase. Once I got that sorted out it
    has been very stable - I have really stressed failure modes we run
    into at work - nodes going down while heavy writes were happening.
    Live migrations during heals. gluster software being killed while VM
    were running on the host. So far its held up without a hitch.

    
    To that end, one thing I think should be made more obvious is the
    settings required for VM Hosting:

    
      quick-read=off
read-ahead=off
io-cache=off
stat-prefetch=off
eager-lock=enable
remote-dio=enable
quorum-type=auto
server-quorum-type=server
    
    They are  quite crucial and very easy to miss in the online docs.
    And they are only recommended with noo mention that you will corrupt
    KVM VM's if you live migrate them between gluster nodes without them
    set. Also the virt group is missing from the debian packages.

    
    Setting them does seem to have slowed sequential writes by about 10%
    but I need to test that more.

    
    Something related - sharding is useful because it makes heals much
    more granular and hence faster. To that end it would be really
    useful if there was a heal info variant that gave a overview of the
    process - rather than list the shards that are being healed, just a
    aggregate total, e.g.

    
    $ gluster volume heal datastore1 status

    volume datastore1

    - split brain: 0

    - Wounded:65

    - healing:4

    
    It gives one a easy feeling of progress - heals aren't happening
    faster, but it would feel that way :)

    
    Also, it would be great if the heal info command could return
    faster, sometimes it takes over a minute.

    
    Thanks for the great work,

    
    Lindsay

  
_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users