Re: Unable to start glusterfs-server after upgrade to 3.7.6

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



thanks pierre. Im trying to downgrade back to 3.6 as suggested by you and joe earlier but im having some problems.
I



On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 1:51 AM, Pierre MGP Pro <pierre-mgp-jouy.inra@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Kaamesh,

Le 29/11/2015 17:57, Kaamesh Kamalaaharan a écrit :
Hi everyone, 
I am using gluster for the past year with no problem. Decided to upgrade to v3.7.6 and i couldnt start gluster ever since. this is the error im getting

I manage two glusterfs :
  • one with 14 nodes and two volumes around 500To ;
  • the other with four nodes with also two volumes  with  To ;

I work with the 3.6.6 released.  Why ?

I have tested one day the 7.x release and encounter many problems as you. That doesn't means that the 3.7.x track is bad,  that means the theses releases are  a test releases ans need more attention, that the stable releases.


My opinion,  is that I will work always with the 3.6.6 release, still the 3.8.x which is announced as a more reliable release.
And the I will build numerous VM with that release to work on the configuration differences before put them in production.

I think that it's the more fluently approach of a such complex system.

Sincerely

Pierre Léonard



On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 1:51 AM, Pierre MGP Pro <pierre-mgp-jouy.inra@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Kaamesh,

Le 29/11/2015 17:57, Kaamesh Kamalaaharan a écrit :
Hi everyone, 
I am using gluster for the past year with no problem. Decided to upgrade to v3.7.6 and i couldnt start gluster ever since. this is the error im getting

I manage two glusterfs :
  • one with 14 nodes and two volumes around 500To ;
  • the other with four nodes with also two volumes  with  To ;

I work with the 3.6.6 released.  Why ?

I have tested one day the 7.x release and encounter many problems as you. That doesn't means that the 3.7.x track is bad,  that means the theses releases are  a test releases ans need more attention, that the stable releases.


My opinion,  is that I will work always with the 3.6.6 release, still the 3.8.x which is announced as a more reliable release.
And the I will build numerous VM with that release to work on the configuration differences before put them in production.

I think that it's the more fluently approach of a such complex system.

Sincerely

Pierre Léonard


_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users

[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Development]     [Linux Filesytems Development]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux