Can someone confirm if it's OK to upgrade from RHGS 3 to 3.1 if I have a mix of RH and ubuntu clients ? All the ubuntu clients are on 3.6, and the ones on 12.04 will remain on 3.6 because of lack of 3.7 on the platform. Since setting the op version is irreversible, I would like to proceed with caution.
On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 8:13 AM, Gluster Admin <gluster@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Another update, after playing with our Oracle Enterprise Linux servers and still not having luck I noted two things:1) OEL 6 in Redhat Kernel works fine with 3.7.2 gluster fuse to RHS 3.12) OEL 6.6 UEK kernel does not work at all with 3.8.13-16 which is installed by default. I updated to latest UEK kernel below and now gluster fuse mounts to RHS 3.1 and Open Source Gluster 3.7.x work wellkernel-uek-3.8.13-98.2.2.el6uek.x86_64kernel-uek-firmware-3.8.13-98.2.2.el6uek.noarch[root@localhost ~]# uname -aLinux localhost.localdomain 3.8.13-98.2.2.el6uek.x86_64 #2 SMP Tue Sep 15 16:20:45 PDT 2015 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/LinuxOn Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 10:40 AM, Gluster Admin <gluster@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:Just curious here if RH is purposely trying to prevent anyone but RHEL servers using their storage natively via the FUSE client?with RHGS 3.1 I can mount via fuse with no issues on RHEL 6/7 clients but no other variant of Gluster 3.6 or 3.7 client can connect to it. Even tried installing the RHGS fuse and client libs with no success. Same if i try to mount Gluster 3.7 from RHEL with FUSE so its both ways.Just a bummer as we have tons of non RHEL clients and would prefer not to setup NFS HA when the native client performs pretty well and covers all the HA without the hassle.
_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
_______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
