Re: Unnecessary healing in 3-node replication setup on reboot

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Saturday 17 October 2015 03:47 AM, Lindsay Mathieson wrote:

On 17 October 2015 at 02:51, Vijay Bellur <vbellur@xxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:vbellur@xxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:

    You may also want to check sharding (currently in beta with 3.7)
    where large files are chunked to smaller fragments. With this
    scheme, self-healing (and rolling checksum computation thereby)
    happens only on those fragments that undergo changes when one of the
    nodes in a replicated set is offline. This has shown nice
    improvements in gluster's resource utilization during self-healing.


Very interesting, I presume you'd have top create a new volume to test it.

Also you'd loose the ability to access the file on the host filesystem
in emergencies wouldn't you?


Right on both counts. If you are aware of the layout, the shards can be concatenated to get back a single file. It does need some work to locate the shards and we can possibly provide a script that can stitch shards back to a single file.

Regards,
Vijay

_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users



[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Development]     [Linux Filesytems Development]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux