There were some posts regarding incompatibility between versions due to the insecure ports option. http://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/2015-August/023207.html. Perhaps worth a shot ?
On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 3:20 PM, Gluster Admin <gluster@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I would love to know if i am doing something wrong but as it stands I have a redhat gluster 3.1 setup and the only native FUSE clients i can get to work are redhat. I have had no success with Centos 6/7 and various gluster clients or OEL 6 in same case.I am hoping there is some option or something I am not setting and this will actually work.On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 3:11 PM, Prasun Gera <prasun.gera@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:Is this confirmed ? I have held off upgrading from 3.0 to 3.1. I have a lot of Ubuntu clients who are using the ppa for the fuse clients. I don't want to upgrade if it's known to break things.On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 10:40 AM, Gluster Admin <gluster@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:_______________________________________________Just curious here if RH is purposely trying to prevent anyone but RHEL servers using their storage natively via the FUSE client?with RHGS 3.1 I can mount via fuse with no issues on RHEL 6/7 clients but no other variant of Gluster 3.6 or 3.7 client can connect to it. Even tried installing the RHGS fuse and client libs with no success. Same if i try to mount Gluster 3.7 from RHEL with FUSE so its both ways.Just a bummer as we have tons of non RHEL clients and would prefer not to setup NFS HA when the native client performs pretty well and covers all the HA without the hassle.
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
_______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
