RAID vs bare drive for bricks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




So in most of the documentation I read from both redhat and gluster.org it seems to reference using RAID on the servers for the bricks.  This is a nice failsafe but obviously has reduced capacity repurcussions as you continue to scale with nodes and bricks.

With Gluster 3.7+ is it still recommended to use hardware RAID for the underlying disks of the bricks or especially in the case of Replica-3 would it be better to have individual drives as bricks?

In the scenario of many servers and bricks lets say 12 servers with 12 drives each that would yield a scenario where 3 servers would have a copy of the data on each brick and assuming a multi rack layout would lead to a fairly distributed fault domain.

Am I missing something here?  I can see hardware raid for smaller implementations of a few servers but it seems counterproductive for larger distributed-replicated setups

thanks
_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users

[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Development]     [Linux Filesytems Development]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux