Re: Keeping it Simple replication for HA

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Have you considered the disperse volume? We'd normally advocate 6 servers for a +2 redundancy factor though.

Paul C

On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 5:47 AM, <aaron@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Gluster users,

I am looking to implement GlusterFS on my network for large, expandable,
and redundant storage.

I have 5 servers with 1 brick each.  All I want is a simple replication
that requires at least 3 of the 5 bricks have a copy of the data so I can
lose any 2 bricks without data loss.  I have tried replica 3 with 5 bricks
but it seems to complain that my # of bricks must be a multiple of of my
replica count.

There a simple replication method like replica=3 with 5 bricks with
glusterfs?  Is there a better or different technology I can use for this?

Thanks,
Aaron

_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users

_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users

[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Development]     [Linux Filesytems Development]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux