Have you considered the disperse volume? We'd normally advocate 6 servers for a +2 redundancy factor though.
Paul COn Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 5:47 AM, <aaron@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Gluster users,
I am looking to implement GlusterFS on my network for large, expandable,
and redundant storage.
I have 5 servers with 1 brick each. All I want is a simple replication
that requires at least 3 of the 5 bricks have a copy of the data so I can
lose any 2 bricks without data loss. I have tried replica 3 with 5 bricks
but it seems to complain that my # of bricks must be a multiple of of my
replica count.
There a simple replication method like replica=3 with 5 bricks with
glusterfs? Is there a better or different technology I can use for this?
Thanks,
Aaron
_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
_______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
