Re: Why is it not possible to mount a replicated gluster volume with one Gluster server?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I understand. So my setup is maybe wrong. Vijay, could you please explain how this dummy node setup would look like? 

Do you recommend to setup a glusterd on node3 and replicate to 3 servers? In my understanding this would significantly reduce performance as files have to be replicated 3 times. Would it be possible to mount the volume if 2 of 3 glusterd servers are live?

2015-08-31 19:41 GMT+02:00 Vijay Bellur <vbellur@xxxxxxxxxx>:
On Monday 31 August 2015 10:42 PM, Atin Mukherjee wrote:
 > 2. Server2 dies. Server1 has to reboot.
 >
 > In this case the service stays down. It is inpossible to remount the
share without Server1. This is not acceptable for a High Availability
System and I believe also not intended, but a misconfiguration or bug.
This is exactly what I gave as an example in the thread (please read
again). GlusterD is not supposed to start brick process if its other
counter part hasn't come up yet in a 2 node setup. The reason it has
been designed in this way is to block GlusterD on operating on a volume
which could be stale as the node was down and cluster was operational
earlier.

For two node deployments, a third dummy node is recommended to ensure that quorum is maintained when one of the nodes is down.

Regards,
Vijay

_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users

[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Development]     [Linux Filesytems Development]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux