On 21 August 2015 at 23:46, Christian Rice <crice@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I’d like to have a distributed-replicated master volume, and distributed-only slave.
Can this be done? Just beginning the research, but so far I’ve only done geo-replication with distributed-only volumes. Tips/caveats on this kind architecture are welcome.
Yes, This can be done. Both master and slave can be of different configurations.
But make sure that your slave volume has more effective size available than the master volume.
HTH
//MS
The rationale is straightforward—the master volume should be able to stay available with all data when suffering a node loss, but the geo-replicated volumes can be taken offline for repairs and resync as soon as possible.
Cheers,Christian
_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
_______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
