Re: [Nfs-ganesha-devel] Questions on ganesha HA and shared storage size

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 08:27:57AM -0400, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I would actually prefer that we solve the issue with using the unbundled
> libntirpc. That seems like the better long term solution, and one we
> have to tackle anyway as we have a hard end date for using the bundled
> libntirpc in Fedora and EPEL.

Of course, that is the plan. I still need to test on Fedora where
libntirpc was unbundled. Unfortunately there are very little other users
of libntirpc, so testing with a non-ganesha application is not as
simple as I hoped.

I'll continue to investigate this in small steps. When I have more ideas
on what the problem could be, I'll inform everyone :)

> In the mean time I've reverted the EPEL 7 build (and perhaps the Fedora
> Rawhide build too) to use the bundled lib. Packages will land in Fedora
> and EPEL after a nominal testing period. Or you can get them sooner by
> enabling the Updates-Testing repo in
> /etc/yum.repos.d/{fedora-updates-testing,epel-testing}.repo

Thanks, that surely works for the immediate problem.

Niels

> Regards,
> 
> --
> 
> Kaleb
> 
> On 06/16/2015 07:57 PM, Malahal Naineni wrote:
> > Thank you Niels for your time to chase the issue. It is important to
> > have working files as people try, and "move on" if things don't work.
> > Not everyone is as persistent as Alessandro!
> > 
> > Regards, Malahal.
> > 
> > Niels de Vos [ndevos@xxxxxxxxxx] wrote:
> >> On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 06:50:21PM -0500, Malahal Naineni wrote:
> >>> Kaleb Keithley [kkeithle@xxxxxxxxxx] wrote:
> >>>> But note that nfs-ganesha in EPEL[67] is built with a) glusterfs-api-3.6.x from Red Hat's "downstream" glusterfs, and b) the "bundled" static version of ntirpc, not the shared lib in the stand-along package above. If you're trying to use these packages with glusterfs-3.7.x then I guess I'm not too surprised if something isn't working. Look for nfs-ganesha packages built against glusterfs-3.7.x in the CentOS Storage SIG or watch for the same on download.gluster.org. They're not there yet, but they will be eventually.
> >>>
> >>> If I understood the issue, he wasn't even using gluster FSAL (he wasn't
> >>> using any exports at all). His issue is probably unrelated to any
> >>> gluster API changes.
> >>
> >> It seems that un-bunding the libntirpc causes this problem. Bisecting
> >> the NFS-Ganesha package builds for the epel7 branch show this. Also,
> >> re-bundling the libntirpc package makes nfs-ganesha-2.2.0 work again. I
> >> do not know yet where the actual problem is, maybe the libntirpc package
> >> in Fedora/EPEL does not work correctly, or there are some linker changes
> >> needed for NFS-Ganesha to build against the non-bundled libntirpc.
> >>
> >> I've only tested on CentOS-7 for now. Maybe the Fedora 22 libntirpc and
> >> nfs-ganesha packages have the same problem?
> >>
> >> In case someone cares, this is my patch against the current epel7
> >> nfs-ganesha.spec: http://paste.fedoraproject.org/232837/44926521/
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Niels
> >>
> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Nfs-ganesha-devel mailing list
> >> Nfs-ganesha-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs-ganesha-devel
> >>
> > 
> 
> -- 
> 
> Kaleb
_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users



[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Development]     [Linux Filesytems Development]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux