From: Niels de Vos <ndevos@xxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Monday, May 25, 2015 4:44 PM On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 06:49:26PM +0000, Ted Miller wrote: > > ________________________________ > From: Humble Devassy Chirammal <humble.devassy@xxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Monday, May 18, 2015 9:37 AM > Hi All, > > GlusterFS 3.7.0 RPMs for RHEL, CentOS, Fedora and packages for Debian are available at download.gluster.org<http://download.gluster.org> [1]. > > [1] http://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/3.7/3.7.0/ > > --Humble > > > On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 2:49 PM, Vijay Bellur <vbellur@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:vbellur@xxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: > > Hi All, > > I am happy to announce that Gluster 3.7.0 is now generally available. 3.7.0 contains several > > [snip] > > Cheers, > Vijay > > [snip] > > What happened to packages for RHEL/Centos 5? I have the (probably > unusual--added gluster to existing servers) setup of running a replica > 3 cluster where two nodes run on Centos 6 and one is still on Centos > 5. This is a personal setup, and I have been using > http://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/LATEST/EPEL.repo/epel-5/x86_64/repodata/repomod.xml > as my repo. It has worked fine for a while, but this time the two > Centos 6 nodes updated to 3.7, but the Centos 5 node got left behind > at 3.6.3. Packages for RHEL/CentOS-5 are not available yet. These will follow later. Thare are some changes needed to be able to build the packages on EL5. Because we are currently stabilizing our CI/regression tests, we do not merge any other changes. Until we provide packages in our repository, you could apply patch http://review.gluster.org/10803 yourself and build the EL5 version. I expect that we will do a release in 2-3 weeks which will have EL5 RPMs too. I have no idea about the problem below, it sounds like something the GlusterD developers could help with. Niels > Command 'gluster volume status' on the C5 machine makes everything > look fine: > > Status of volume: ISO2 > Gluster process Port Online Pid > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Brick 10.x.x.2:/bricks/01/iso2 49162 Y 4679 > Brick 10.x.x.4:/bricks/01/iso2 49183 Y 6447 > Brick 10.x.x.9:/bricks/01/iso2 49169 Y 1985 > > But the same command on either of the C6 machines shows the C5 machine > (10.x.x.2) missing in action (though it does recognize that there are > NFS and heal daemons there): > > Status of volume: ISO2 > Gluster process TCP Port RDMA Port Online Pid > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Brick 10.41.65.4:/bricks/01/iso2 49183 0 Y 6447 > Brick 10.41.65.9:/bricks/01/iso2 49169 0 Y 1985 > NFS Server on localhost 2049 0 Y 2279 > Self-heal Daemon on localhost N/A N/A Y 2754 > NFS Server on 10.41.65.2 2049 0 Y 4757 > Self-heal Daemon on 10.41.65.2 N/A N/A Y 4764 > NFS Server on 10.41.65.4 2049 0 Y 6543 > Self-heal Daemon on 10.41.65.4 N/A N/A Y 6551 > > So, is this just an oversight (I hope), or has support for C5 been dropped? > If support for C5 is gone, how do I downgrade my Centos6 machines back > to 3.6.x? (I know how to change the repo, but the actual sequence of > yum commands and gluster commands is unknown to me). > > Ted Miller > Elkhart, IN, USA Thanks for the information. As long as I know it is coming, I can improvise and hang on. I am assuming that the problem with the .2 machine not being seen is a result of running a cluster with a version split. Ted Miller _______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
